Nathan Kendrix Frazier v. Martin Frink
Filing
33
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Dolly M. Gee. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation 27 is accepted. 2. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. 3. Petitioner's Motion Requesting an Evidentiary Hearing is DENIED. 4. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this Order. 5. The clerk shall serve this Order and the Judgment on all counsel or parties of record. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (ch)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WESTERN DIVISION
11
12
NATHAN KENDRIX FRAZIER,
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
15
MARTIN FRINK, Warden,
Respondent.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 16-4255-DMG (PLA)
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
17
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file
19
herein, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Petitioner’s Objections to the Report
20
and Recommendation, and Petitioner’s Motion Requesting an Evidentiary Hearing filed on April
21
28, 2017. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and
22
Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the recommendations
23
of the Magistrate Judge.
24
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:
25
1.
The Report and Recommendation is accepted.
26
2.
Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss is granted.
27
3.
Petitioner’s Motion Requesting an Evidentiary Hearing is denied.
28
1
4.
Judgment shall be entered consistent with this Order.
2
5.
The clerk shall serve this Order and the Judgment on all counsel or parties of record.
3
4
DATED: September 19, 2017
___________________________________
DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?