Nathan Kendrix Frazier v. Martin Frink

Filing 33

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Dolly M. Gee. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Report and Recommendation 27 is accepted. 2. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. 3. Petitioner's Motion Requesting an Evidentiary Hearing is DENIED. 4. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this Order. 5. The clerk shall serve this Order and the Judgment on all counsel or parties of record. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (ch)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 NATHAN KENDRIX FRAZIER, Petitioner, 13 v. 14 15 MARTIN FRINK, Warden, Respondent. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 16-4255-DMG (PLA) ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file 19 herein, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Petitioner’s Objections to the Report 20 and Recommendation, and Petitioner’s Motion Requesting an Evidentiary Hearing filed on April 21 28, 2017. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and 22 Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the recommendations 23 of the Magistrate Judge. 24 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: 25 1. The Report and Recommendation is accepted. 26 2. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss is granted. 27 3. Petitioner’s Motion Requesting an Evidentiary Hearing is denied. 28 1 4. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this Order. 2 5. The clerk shall serve this Order and the Judgment on all counsel or parties of record. 3 4 DATED: September 19, 2017 ___________________________________ DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?