Cory Dwayne Micenheimer v. P. Finander et al

Filing 92

JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney, in favor of JOHN DOE, an individual, M Rabanipour, P. Finander, P. Shank, S. Morris against Cory Dwayne Micenheimer Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 91 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the action against Defendants Finander, Morris, Shank, and Rabanipour is dismissed with prejudice and the action against the Doedefendant is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbou)

Download PDF
1 2 3 JS-6 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 CORY DWAYNE MICENHEIMER, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. P. FINANDER, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 16-4314-CJC (JEM) JUDGMENT In accordance with the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge filed concurrently herewith, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the action against Defendants Finander, Morris, 20 Shank, and Rabanipour is dismissed with prejudice and the action against the Doe 21 defendant is dismissed without prejudice. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: October 16, 2018 CORMAC J. CARNEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?