Eduard Reitshtein v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Filing 16

MINUTE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED FOR FAILING TO TIMELY FILE MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ANSWER by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. Defendant is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, why he should not be sanctioned for failing to timely file a Memorandum in Support of Defendants Answer. (mz)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 16-04334-SS Title: Eduard Reitshtein v. Carolyn W. Colvin DOCKET ENTRY: Date: January 23, 2017 Page 1 of 1 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED FOR FAILING TO TIMELY FILE MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ANSWER PRESENT: HONORABLE SUZANNE H. SEGAL, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Marlene Ramirez Deputy Clerk None Court Reporter/Recorder ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF(S): None Present None Tape No. ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT(S): None Present PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) On December 14, 2016, Eduard Reitshtein (Plaintiff”) filed a Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff’s Complaint (the “Complaint Memo.”). Pursuant to the Court’s June 23, 2016 Order Re: Procedures in Social Security Appeal, Defendant was required to file a “Memorandum in Support of Defendant’s Answer” by January 18, 2016. As of today, Defendant has not filed the required memorandum. Accordingly, Defendant is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, why he should not be sanctioned for failing to timely file a Memorandum in Support of Defendant’s Answer. Plaintiff may discharge this Order by either filing a Memorandum in Support of Defendant’s Answer, or a declaration, signed under penalty of perjury, establishing good cause as to why Defendant has been unable to file the required memorandum. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order on counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant. MINUTES FORM 11 CIVIL-GEN Initials of Deputy Clerk MR_

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?