Eduard Reitshtein v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
16
MINUTE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED FOR FAILING TO TIMELY FILE MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ANSWER by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. Defendant is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, why he should not be sanctioned for failing to timely file a Memorandum in Support of Defendants Answer. (mz)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
CV 16-04334-SS
Title:
Eduard Reitshtein v. Carolyn W. Colvin
DOCKET ENTRY:
Date: January 23, 2017
Page 1 of 1
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT SHOULD NOT BE
SANCTIONED FOR FAILING TO TIMELY FILE MEMORANDUM IN
SUPPORT OF ANSWER
PRESENT:
HONORABLE SUZANNE H. SEGAL, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Marlene Ramirez
Deputy Clerk
None
Court Reporter/Recorder
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF(S):
None Present
None
Tape No.
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT(S):
None Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)
On December 14, 2016, Eduard Reitshtein (Plaintiff”) filed a Memorandum in Support
of Plaintiff’s Complaint (the “Complaint Memo.”). Pursuant to the Court’s June 23, 2016
Order Re: Procedures in Social Security Appeal, Defendant was required to file a “Memorandum in
Support of Defendant’s Answer” by January 18, 2016. As of today, Defendant has not filed the
required memorandum.
Accordingly, Defendant is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, within ten (10) days of the
date of this Order, why he should not be sanctioned for failing to timely file a Memorandum in
Support of Defendant’s Answer. Plaintiff may discharge this Order by either filing a
Memorandum in Support of Defendant’s Answer, or a declaration, signed under penalty of
perjury, establishing good cause as to why Defendant has been unable to file the required
memorandum.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order on counsel for Plaintiff
and counsel for Defendant.
MINUTES FORM 11
CIVIL-GEN
Initials of Deputy Clerk MR_
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?