Christopher Wayne Fillmore v. Jason Blum, et al
Filing
90
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before July 6, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecut ion. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Plaintiff(s) have failed to file a proof of service within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint on the following Defendant(s): MATTHEW KAPLAN. See document for details. (smo)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.:
Title:
CV 16-04348-AB (SSx)
Date:
June 22, 2017
Christopher Wayne Fillmore v. Jason Blum, et al
Present: The Honorable
ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR., United States District Judge
Carla Badirian
N/A
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter
Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s):
Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):
None Appearing
None Appearing
Proceedings:
[In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of
Prosecution
Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack of prosecution.
Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution
on its own motion).
The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before July 6, 2017, why
this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The
Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to
this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.
Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the
summons and complaint are not served on a Defendant within 90 days after the complaint
is filed. Plaintiff(s) have failed to file a proof of service within 90 days of the filing of the
Complaint on the following Defendant(s): MATTHEW KAPLAN
Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by showing that service was effectuated within the 90 day
deadline or by showing good cause for the failure to do so. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CV-90 (12/02)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Initials of Deputy Clerk CB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?