Ikey Porter Currey v. K. Seibel, et al.

Filing 34

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. (afe)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IKEY PORTER CURRY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 K. SEIBEL, Official Capacity as Associate Warden, et. al., 16 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. CV 16-4491-JLS (AS) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the 19 Second Amended Complaint, all of the records herein, and the Report and 20 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge to which no objections 21 were filed. The Court notes that after the Magistrate Judge’s issuance 22 of the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff submitted a notice of 23 change of address, following his release on parole (Docket No. 31). 24 The Report and Recommendation was mailed to Plaintiff at his new 25 address (Docket No. 30), along with a copy of the Court’s May 12, 2017 26 Order to Show Cause (Docket Nos. 23, 33). Plaintiff has not responded 27 to 28 the Court’s Orders, filed objections to the Report and 1 Recommendation or sought an extension of time to do so, or communicated 2 with 3 conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the findings, 4 5 6 IT IS ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. 7 8 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order 9 and the Judgment herein on Plaintiff at his current address of record. 10 11 LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. 12 13 DATED: September 15, 2017. 14 15 16 17 JOSEPHINE L. STATON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?