Kevin Forestal v. Barry G. Caldwell et al

Filing 60

JUDGMENT 50 57 58 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that final judgment in this action be entered in favor all Defendants, and that Plaintiff Kevin Forestal shall take nothing by way of his Complaint. Defendants are awarded their costs as provided by law. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)

1

JS-6

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

Case No. CV 16-4492-MWF (GJSx)

KEVIN FORESTAL,
Plaintiff,
12
v.
11

JUDGMENT

13 BARRY G. CALDWELL, et al.,
14

Defendants.

15
16
17
18

This action was dismissed after Plaintiff Kevin Forestal filed a Notice of

19 Intent Not to File Amended Complaint. (Docket No. 58). The Court had granted
20 Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 50) and denied Plaintiff’s Motion for
21 Reconsideration (Docket No. 57).
22

Plaintiff Kevin Forestal was represented by Robert B. Weiser, Brett D.

23 Stecker, James M. Ficaro, and Kathleen A. Herkenhoff, of the Weiser Law Firm,
24 P.C.; and Daniel L. Germain of Rosman & Germain LLP. Defendants Barry G.
25 Caldwell, John S. Santos, Caren Mason, Mark B. Logan, Stephen C. Farrell,
26 Richard A. Meier, John C. Moore, J. Steven Roush, Louis E. Silverman, William
27 P. Wall, and Nominal Defendant STAAR Surgical Company, were represented by
28 Dan E. Marmalefsky and Kai S. Bartolomeo, of Morrison and Foerster LLP.
-1-

JUDGMENT

1

Now, therefore, pursuant to Rules 54 and 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil

2 Procedure, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that
3 final judgment in this action be entered in favor all Defendants, and that Plaintiff
4 Kevin Forestal shall take nothing by way of his Complaint.
5

Defendants are awarded their costs as provided by law.

6
7
8

Dated: January 31, 2017.

_______________________________
MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

JUDGMENT