Cree, Inc. v. Gearxs, Inc. et al

Filing 66

PERMANENT INJUNCTION against Defendant West Coast Imports, Inc., by Judge John F. Walter: ORDERS, ADJUDICATES and DECREES that a permanent injunctionshall be and hereby is entered against Defendant as follows: Defendant and any person or entity actin g in concert with, or at its direction, including any and all agents, servants, employees, partners, assignees, and any others over which they may exercise control, are hereby restrained and enjoined. (SEE ATTACHMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). Each party shall bear its/his own attorneys' fees and costs incurred in this matter. Upon entry of this Permanent Injunction against Defendants, the case shall be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. (Case CLOSED). (jp)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 WESTERN DIVISION 9 10 CREE, INC., a North Carolina Corporation, 11 Plaintiff, 12 Case No.: 2:16-cv-04515-JFW-PLAx v. 13 14 15 16 PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS WEST COAST IMPORTS, INC. GEARXS, INC., an Illinois Corporation; REFAEL YITZHAKI, an Individual d/b/a GEARXS, INC.; WEST COAST IMPORTS, INC.; and DOES 1-10, Inclusive, Defendants. Hon. John F. Walters 17 18 The Court, pursuant to the Stipulation for Entry of Permanent Injunction 19 and Dismissal of Entire Action by and between Plaintiff Cree, Inc. (“Plaintiff”), 20 and Defendants West Coast Imports, Inc. (“Defendants”), on the other hand, 21 hereby ORDERS, ADJUDICATES and DECREES that a permanent injunction 22 shall be and hereby is entered against Defendant as follows: 23 1. PERMANENT INJUNCTION. Defendant and any person or entity 24 acting in concert with, or at its direction, including any and all agents, servants, 25 employees, partners, assignees, and any others over which they may exercise 26 control, are hereby restrained and enjoined, pursuant to 15 United States Code 27 (“U.S.C.”) § 1116(a), from engaging in, directly or indirectly, or authorizing or 28 assisting any third party to engage in, any of the following activities in the United -1- PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL 1 States and throughout the world: (i) 2 copying, manufacturing, importing, exporting, purchasing, 3 marketing, advertising, offering for sale, selling, receiving, storing, fulfilling, 4 distributing or dealing in any product or service that uses, or otherwise making 5 any use of, any of Plaintiffs’ intellectual properties, including but not limited to, 6 the CREE® (Reg. Nos. 2,440,530; 2,452,761; 3,935,628; 3,935,629; 3,938,970; 7 4,026,756; 3,935,630; 3,935,631; 3,938,971; 2,922,689; 3,998,141; 3,998,142; 8 4,233,855; 4,234,124; 4,641,937; 4,597,310; 4,597,311; 4,767,107; 4,771,402; 9 4,787,288), CREE LEDS® (Reg. Nos. 3,360,315; 4,558,924), CREE LED 10 LIGHT® (Reg. No. 3,327,299), CREE LED LIGHTING® (Reg. Nos. 11 3,891,756; 3,891,765), CREE LED LIGHTING SOLUTIONS® (Reg. No. 12 3,526,887), and CREE TRUEWHITE® (Reg. Nos. 4,029,469; 4,091,530), CREE 13 TRUEWHITE TECHNOLOGY (Reg. Nos. 4,286,398; 4,099,381) word and 14 design trademarks affixed as Exhibits “A” - “DD” to Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF 15 Dkt. 30, ¶21)(collectively, “Plaintiff’s Intellectual Properties”); 16 (ii) copying, manufacturing, importing, exporting, marketing, sale, 17 offering for sale, distributing or dealing in any product or service which uses, or 18 otherwise makes any use of, any of CREE’s Marks, and/or any Plaintiff’s 19 Intellectual Property, pursuant to the causes of action of this Litigation, which is 20 confusingly or substantially similar to, or which constitutes a colorable imitation 21 of, any of CREE’s Marks, whether such use is as, on, in or in connection with any 22 trademark, service mark, trade name, logo, design, Internet use, website, domain 23 name, metatags, advertising, promotions, solicitations, commercial exploitation, 24 television, web-based or any other program, or any product or service, or 25 otherwise using, advertising or displaying Plaintiff’s Intellectual Properties to 26 suggest 27 manufactured, sponsored or endorsed by Plaintiff; 28 that non-genuine (iii) CREE-related products being advertised are performing or allowing others employed by or representing -2- PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL 1 them, or under their control, to perform any act or things prohibited by law, 2 which is likely to injure CREE, any of CREE’s Marks; (iv) 3 engaging in any acts of federal and/or state trademark 4 infringement, false designation of origin, unfair competition, dilution, or other act 5 which would tend to damage or injure CREE; and/or (iii) 6 7 that uses any of Plaintiff’s Intellectual Properties. 2. 8 9 This Permanent Injunction does not apply to authentic CREE LEDs or component parts bearing Plaintiff’s Intellectual Properties authorized by CREE. 3. 10 11 owning or controlling any Internet domain name or website This Permanent Injunction shall be deemed to have been served upon Defendants at the time of its execution by the Court. 4. 12 The Court finds there is no just reason for delay in entering this 13 Permanent Injunction against Defendants, and the Court directs immediate entry 14 of this Permanent Injunction against Defendants. 15 5. NO APPEALS AND CONTINUING JURISDICTION. No 16 appeals shall be taken from this Permanent Injunction, and the parties waive all 17 rights to appeal. This Court expressly retains jurisdiction over this matter to 18 enforce any violation of the terms of this Permanent Injunction and Confidential 19 Settlement Agreement by the parties. 20 21 6. NO FEES AND COSTS. Each party shall bear its/his own attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in this matter. 22 7. DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION. Upon entry of this Permanent 23 Injunction against Defendants, the case shall be dismissed with prejudice in its 24 entirety. IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDICATED and DECREED this 7th day of July, 25 26 27 28 2017. _______________________________ HON. JOHN F. WALTER United States District Judge -3- PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?