Cree, Inc. v. Gearxs, Inc. et al
Filing
66
PERMANENT INJUNCTION against Defendant West Coast Imports, Inc., by Judge John F. Walter: ORDERS, ADJUDICATES and DECREES that a permanent injunctionshall be and hereby is entered against Defendant as follows: Defendant and any person or entity actin g in concert with, or at its direction, including any and all agents, servants, employees, partners, assignees, and any others over which they may exercise control, are hereby restrained and enjoined. (SEE ATTACHMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). Each party shall bear its/his own attorneys' fees and costs incurred in this matter. Upon entry of this Permanent Injunction against Defendants, the case shall be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. (Case CLOSED). (jp)
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
WESTERN DIVISION
9
10
CREE, INC., a North Carolina
Corporation,
11
Plaintiff,
12
Case No.: 2:16-cv-04515-JFW-PLAx
v.
13
14
15
16
PERMANENT INJUNCTION
AGAINST DEFENDANTS WEST
COAST IMPORTS, INC.
GEARXS, INC., an Illinois Corporation;
REFAEL YITZHAKI, an Individual
d/b/a GEARXS, INC.; WEST COAST
IMPORTS, INC.; and DOES 1-10,
Inclusive,
Defendants.
Hon. John F. Walters
17
18
The Court, pursuant to the Stipulation for Entry of Permanent Injunction
19
and Dismissal of Entire Action by and between Plaintiff Cree, Inc. (“Plaintiff”),
20
and Defendants West Coast Imports, Inc. (“Defendants”), on the other hand,
21
hereby ORDERS, ADJUDICATES and DECREES that a permanent injunction
22
shall be and hereby is entered against Defendant as follows:
23
1.
PERMANENT INJUNCTION. Defendant and any person or entity
24
acting in concert with, or at its direction, including any and all agents, servants,
25
employees, partners, assignees, and any others over which they may exercise
26
control, are hereby restrained and enjoined, pursuant to 15 United States Code
27
(“U.S.C.”) § 1116(a), from engaging in, directly or indirectly, or authorizing or
28
assisting any third party to engage in, any of the following activities in the United
-1-
PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL
1
States and throughout the world:
(i)
2
copying, manufacturing, importing, exporting, purchasing,
3
marketing, advertising, offering for sale, selling, receiving, storing, fulfilling,
4
distributing or dealing in any product or service that uses, or otherwise making
5
any use of, any of Plaintiffs’ intellectual properties, including but not limited to,
6
the CREE® (Reg. Nos. 2,440,530; 2,452,761; 3,935,628; 3,935,629; 3,938,970;
7
4,026,756; 3,935,630; 3,935,631; 3,938,971; 2,922,689; 3,998,141; 3,998,142;
8
4,233,855; 4,234,124; 4,641,937; 4,597,310; 4,597,311; 4,767,107; 4,771,402;
9
4,787,288), CREE LEDS® (Reg. Nos. 3,360,315; 4,558,924), CREE LED
10
LIGHT® (Reg. No. 3,327,299), CREE LED LIGHTING® (Reg. Nos.
11
3,891,756; 3,891,765), CREE LED LIGHTING SOLUTIONS® (Reg. No.
12
3,526,887), and CREE TRUEWHITE® (Reg. Nos. 4,029,469; 4,091,530), CREE
13
TRUEWHITE TECHNOLOGY (Reg. Nos. 4,286,398; 4,099,381) word and
14
design trademarks affixed as Exhibits “A” - “DD” to Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF
15
Dkt. 30, ¶21)(collectively, “Plaintiff’s Intellectual Properties”);
16
(ii)
copying, manufacturing, importing, exporting, marketing, sale,
17
offering for sale, distributing or dealing in any product or service which uses, or
18
otherwise makes any use of, any of CREE’s Marks, and/or any Plaintiff’s
19
Intellectual Property, pursuant to the causes of action of this Litigation, which is
20
confusingly or substantially similar to, or which constitutes a colorable imitation
21
of, any of CREE’s Marks, whether such use is as, on, in or in connection with any
22
trademark, service mark, trade name, logo, design, Internet use, website, domain
23
name, metatags, advertising, promotions, solicitations, commercial exploitation,
24
television, web-based or any other program, or any product or service, or
25
otherwise using, advertising or displaying Plaintiff’s Intellectual Properties to
26
suggest
27
manufactured, sponsored or endorsed by Plaintiff;
28
that
non-genuine
(iii)
CREE-related
products
being
advertised
are
performing or allowing others employed by or representing
-2-
PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL
1
them, or under their control, to perform any act or things prohibited by law,
2
which is likely to injure CREE, any of CREE’s Marks;
(iv)
3
engaging in any acts of federal and/or state trademark
4
infringement, false designation of origin, unfair competition, dilution, or other act
5
which would tend to damage or injure CREE; and/or
(iii)
6
7
that uses any of Plaintiff’s Intellectual Properties.
2.
8
9
This Permanent Injunction does not apply to authentic CREE LEDs
or component parts bearing Plaintiff’s Intellectual Properties authorized by CREE.
3.
10
11
owning or controlling any Internet domain name or website
This Permanent Injunction shall be deemed to have been served upon
Defendants at the time of its execution by the Court.
4.
12
The Court finds there is no just reason for delay in entering this
13
Permanent Injunction against Defendants, and the Court directs immediate entry
14
of this Permanent Injunction against Defendants.
15
5.
NO APPEALS AND CONTINUING JURISDICTION.
No
16
appeals shall be taken from this Permanent Injunction, and the parties waive all
17
rights to appeal. This Court expressly retains jurisdiction over this matter to
18
enforce any violation of the terms of this Permanent Injunction and Confidential
19
Settlement Agreement by the parties.
20
21
6.
NO FEES AND COSTS. Each party shall bear its/his own attorneys’
fees and costs incurred in this matter.
22
7.
DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION. Upon entry of this Permanent
23
Injunction against Defendants, the case shall be dismissed with prejudice in its
24
entirety.
IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDICATED and DECREED this 7th day of July,
25
26
27
28
2017.
_______________________________
HON. JOHN F. WALTER
United States District Judge
-3-
PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?