D. W. v. Los Angeles Unified School District et al
Filing
26
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian re Stipulation for Protective Order 25 (dml)
1 Mark K. Kitabayashi, SBN 125822
mkitabayashi@lozanosmith.com
2 Matthew R. Hicks, SBN 191772
mhicks@lozanosmith.com
3 LOZANO SMITH
515 South Figueroa Street, Suite 750
4 Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone:
5 Facsimile:
(213) 929-1066
(213) 929-1077
6 Attorneys for Defendants LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and
7
MICHELLE KING
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
LOZANO SMITH
515 South Figueroa Street, Suite 750 Los Angeles, CA 90071
Tel 213-929-1066 Fax 213-929-1077
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 D.W., a minor by and through his parent
Case No. 2:16-CV-4527 PSG (JCx)
12
Assigned to the HONORABLE PHILIP S.
GUTIERREZ
and Guardian Ad Litem, Y.H.,
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
DISCOVERY MATTER
14
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL
ORDER FOR STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
15 DISTRICT, MICHELLE KING,
SUPERINTENDENT OF THE LOS
16 ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT, in her official capacity, and
17 DOES 1-10, inclusive,
Magistrate Judge: Jacqueline Choolijian
Defendants.
18
19
20
The Court, having considered the Stipulated Protective Order submitted by
21 Plaintiff D.W., a minor by and through his guardian ad litem, Y.H., and Defendants Los
22 Angeles Unified School District and Michelle King, and finding good cause shown per
23 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 26(c)(1), hereby Orders as follows:
24
The terms set forth in the Stipulated Protective Order shall be implemented.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26 DATED:
27
November 1, 2016
________________/s/____________________
Hon. Jacqueline Choolijian
United States Magistrate Judge
28
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
ORDER FOR STIPULATED
D.W., et al. v. LAUSD, et al.
Case No.: 16-CV-4527 PSG (JCx)
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?