Reyes Nunez v. Dean Foods Vegetable Company et al

Filing 27

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO OPPOSE DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 21 by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Therefore, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE for his failure to oppose D efendant's Motion. Both (1) Plaintiff's response to this Order and (2) Plaintiff's opposition to the Motion, if any, shall be filed by no later than Monday, June 12, 2017, at 12:00 p.m. An appropriate response will include reasons demo nstrating good cause for Plaintiff's failure to timely oppose Defendant's Motion. If Plaintiff responds accordingly, then Defendant's Reply is due by no later than Thursday, June 15, 2017, at 12:00 p.m. The hearing in this matter is hereby continued to Monday, June 19, 2017, at 1:30 p.m. (rfi)

LINK:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.

CV 16-04549-BRO (RAO)

Title

REYES NUNEZ V. DEAN FOODS VEGETABLE COMPANY ET AL.

Date

June 7, 2017

Present: The Honorable

BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL, United States District Judge

Renee A. Fisher

Not Present

N/A

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter

Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present

Not Present

Proceedings:

(IN CHAMBERS)

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO
OPPOSE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [21]
Pending before the Court is Defendant Alta-Dena Certified Dairy, LLC’s
(“Defendant” or “Alta-Dena”) Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, for
Partial Summary Judgment. (Dkt. No. 21 (hereinafter, “Mot.” or “Motion”).) Alta-Dena
filed its Motion on March 27, 2017, noticing a hearing date of May 15, 2017. (See Mot.)
On April 13, 2017, the Court, finding good cause, accepted the parties’ stipulation to
modify the Pretrial Scheduling Order. (See Dkt. Nos. 23, 24.) The Court continued the
hearing on Defendant’s Motion to June 12, 2017, and instructed the parties that the
opposition and reply deadlines would be recalculated based upon the new hearing date.
(See id.) The Central District of California’s Local Rules require an opposition to be
filed twenty-one (21) days before the noticed hearing date. C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-9.
Accordingly, Plaintiff Reyes Nunez’s (“Plaintiff”) opposition to Defendant’s Motion was
due on Monday, May 22, 2017. As of today’s date, however, Plaintiff has not filed any
opposition.
Therefore, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE for his failure to oppose
Defendant’s Motion. Both (1) Plaintiff’s response to this Order and (2) Plaintiff’s
opposition to the Motion, if any, shall be filed by no later than Monday, June 12, 2017,
at 12:00 p.m.

CV-90 (06/04)

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Page 1 of 2

LINK:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.

CV 16-04549-BRO (RAO)

Title

REYES NUNEZ V. DEAN FOODS VEGETABLE COMPANY ET AL.

Date

June 7, 2017

An appropriate response will include reasons demonstrating good cause for
Plaintiff’s failure to timely oppose Defendant’s Motion. If Plaintiff responds
accordingly, then Defendant’s Reply is due by no later than Thursday, June 15, 2017, at
12:00 p.m. The hearing in this matter is hereby continued to Monday, June 19, 2017, at
1:30 p.m.
:

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Initials of Preparer

CV-90 (06/04)

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

rf

Page 2 of 2