Mei Ma v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. et al
Filing
47
JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. (ah)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, INC., )
a Washington corporation; and DOES 1- )
)
10,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
MEI MA, an individual,
Case No.: 2:16-cv-4558-JAK-AGR
JUDGMENT
JS-6
17
18
The Court, having considered Plaintiff Mei Ma’s Notice of Acceptance of Offer of
19 Judgment and Plaintiff Mei Ma’s Notice of Lodging of Proposed Judgment, and with good
20 cause appearing, hereby ORDERS:
21
That judgment in this action is entered against Defendant Convergent Outsourcing,
22 Inc., and in favor of Plaintiff Mei Ma, in the sum of Forty-Five Thousand Five Hundred
23 Dollars and zero cents ($45,500.00), inclusive of all costs and attorney’s fees. All dates in
24 this matter, including the January 23, 2018 trial date, are hereby vacated, and all remaining
25 DOE defendants are dismissed with prejudice.
26
27
28
Dated: June 30, 2017
__________________________________
HONORABLE JOHN A. KRONSTADT
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?