Robert Lewis Simril v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al

Filing 25

JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant WAL-MART STORES, INC.'s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff ROBERT LEWIS SIMRIL takes nothing by way of his Complaint, that the entire action be dismissed on the merits. (gk)

1
2
3
4
5

Bron E. D’Angelo, Esq., SBN 246819
PETTIT KOHN INGRASSIA & LUTZ PC
9841 Airport Boulevard, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, CA 90045
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

JS-6

Attorneys for Defendant
WAL-MART STORES, INC.

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROBERT LEWIS SIMRIL,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

WAL-MART STORES, INC.; and
DOES 1 to 20,

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Defendants.

CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-04564 AB (PLAx)
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
District Judge:
Magistrate Judge:
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:

June 12, 2017
10:00 a.m.
7B
André Birotte Jr.
Paul L. Abrams
April 4, 2016
December 5, 2017

TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
Upon review of Defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc.’s (“Defendant” or
“Wal-Mart”) moving papers submitted, including the Memorandum of Points and
Authorities, the Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts and Conclusions of Law,
the Notice of Lodgment of Evidence, which includes the Declarations of Bron E.
D’Angelo, Esq., and Declarations of Wal-Mart employees Leticia Soria-Acosta,
Edgar Luna, the Notice of Manual Filing or Lodging in support of its motion for
summary judgment, or alternatively, partial summary judgment, as well as all
papers submitted in reply thereto, and any other matters of which the Court may
take judicial notice, and good cause appearing therefore:

28
2354-8639

1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-04564 AB(PLAX)

1
2
3
4

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant WAL-MART
STORES, INC.’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff ROBERT LEWIS SIMRIL takes
nothing by way of his Complaint, that the entire action be dismissed on the merits.

5
6
7
8

DATED: July 11, 2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2354-8639

2
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-04564 AB(PLAX)