Asencion Gines Dominguez v. Abel De Luna et al
Filing
9
(In Chambers) Order to Show Cause by Judge George H. King. On June 24, 2016, pro se Plaintiff Asencion Gines Dominguez filed this action against Defendants Abel De Luna, Ruben Mondragon, Victor Paramo, Julio Flores, Enrique Facio, Patricia Guerrero , Care More Health Services, Inc., and Does 1-10. (Dkt. 1.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) a defendant must be served with the summons and complaint "within 90 days after the complaint is filed," or we "must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). It has been more than 90 days since the Complaint was filed, and Plaintiff has not filed proof of service as to a ny Defendant. Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file proper proof of service as to each Defendant within 14 days hereof or else show cause in writing, within the same 14 days, why proper service was not effected. Failure to timely or adequately file proof of service or show cause as set forth above, SHALL be deemed Plaintiff's abandonment of this action, and this action will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with our Order. (pso)
E-Filed
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
CV 16-4594-GHK (PLAx)
Title
Asencion Gines Dominguez v. Abel De Luna, et al.
Presiding: The Honorable
Date
October 11, 2016
GEORGE H. KING, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Paul Songco
N/A
N/A
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter / Recorder
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
None
None
Proceedings:
(In Chambers) Order to Show Cause
On June 24, 2016, pro se Plaintiff Asencion Gines Dominguez filed this action against
Defendants Abel De Luna, Ruben Mondragon, Victor Paramo, Julio Flores, Enrique Facio, Patricia
Guerrero, Care More Health Services, Inc., and Does 1-10. (Dkt. 1.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 4(m) a defendant must be served with the summons and complaint “within 90 days after the
complaint is filed,” or we “must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that
service be made within a specified time.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). It has been more than 90 days since the
Complaint was filed, and Plaintiff has not filed proof of service as to any Defendant. Accordingly,
Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file proper proof of service as to each Defendant within 14 days
hereof or else show cause in writing, within the same 14 days, why proper service was not effected.
Failure to timely or adequately file proof of service or show cause as set forth above, SHALL be
deemed Plaintiff’s abandonment of this action, and this action will be dismissed without prejudice for
failure to prosecute and failure to comply with our Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
:
Initials of Deputy Clerk
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
PS
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?