Christopher Keller v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
40
ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 39 . IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $5,800.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and costs in the amount of $400.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion Attorney Fees and Expenses Under the Equal Access To Justice Act filed on February 7, 2018, at docket 37 is vacated in light of the stipulation. (mr)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
CHRISTOPHER KELLER,
10
11
12
Plaintiff,
vs.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
13
Defendant
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:16-cv-05042-PA-SS
ORDER AWARDING EQUAL
ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT
ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)
AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28
U.S.C. § 1920
15
16
17
18
Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal
Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses:
IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $5,800.00 as
19
authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and costs in the amount of $400.00 as authorized
20
by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation.
21
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion Attorney Fees and Expenses
22
Under the Equal Access To Justice Act filed on February 7, 2018, at docket 37 is
23
vacated in light of the stipulation.
24
DATE: 2/22/18
25
26
________________/S/___________________
THE HONORABLE SUZANNE H. SEGAL
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
-1-
1
Respectfully submitted,
2
LAW OFFICES OF Lawrence D. Rohlfing
3
4
/s/ Denise Bourgeois Haley
_________________________
Denise Bourgeois Haley
Attorney for plaintiff Christopher Keller
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?