Tyrone M. Wilson v. D. Davey et al

Filing 28

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank. (See document for further details.) re Report and Recommendation (Issued) 24 . (sbou)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TYRONE M. WILSON, 12 13 14 15 Petitioner, v. D. DAVEY, Warden, Respondent. Case No. LA CV 16-05163 VBF (AFM) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DENYING THE HABEAS PETITION 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the state prisoner’s 18 petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2254 and 19 supporting brief (CM/ECF Document (“Doc”) 1); the respondent government’s 20 answer memorandum (Doc 19), which the Court finds to be well taken; petitioner’s 21 traverse (Doc 23); the state-court briefs, decisions, and other documents lodged by 22 the respondent in paper form (listed in the Notices of Lodging at Docs 20-22); the 23 March 13, 2017 Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 24 (Doc 24); petitioner’s timely objections to the R&R docketed April 3, 2017 (Doc 25 26); and the applicable law. Further, the Court has engaged in de novo review of 26 those portions of the R&R to which petitioner made specific objection. Finding no 27 error of law, fact, or logic in the R&R, the Court orders as follows: 28 1 The Report and Recommendation [Doc #24] is ADOPTED. 2 The petition for a writ of habeas corpus [Doc #1] is DENIED. 3 A separate ruling shall issue on a certificate of appealability. 4 Separate judgment shall issue consistent with this Order and with the R&R. 5 This action shall be TERMINATED and closed (JS-6). 6 7 8 9 Dated: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 ____________________________________ VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?