Tyrone M. Wilson v. D. Davey et al
Filing
31
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 24 (ib)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TYRONE M. WILSON,
12
13
14
15
Petitioner,
v.
D. DAVEY, Warden,
Respondent.
Case No. LA CV 16-05163 VBF (AFM)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DENYING THE HABEAS PETITION
16
17
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the state prisoner’s
18
petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2254 and
19
supporting brief (CM/ECF Document (“Doc”) 1); the respondent government’s
20
answer memorandum (Doc 19), which the Court finds to be well taken; petitioner’s
21
traverse (Doc 23); the state-court briefs, decisions, and other documents lodged by
22
the respondent in paper form (listed in the Notices of Lodging at Docs 20-22); the
23
March 13, 2017 Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge
24
(Doc 24); petitioner’s timely objections to the R&R docketed April 3, 2017 (Doc
25
26); and the applicable law. Further, the Court has engaged in de novo review of
26
those portions of the R&R to which petitioner made specific objection. Finding no
27
error of law, fact, or logic in the R&R, the Court orders as follows:
28
1
The Report and Recommendation [Doc #24] is ADOPTED.
2
The petition for a writ of habeas corpus [Doc #1] is DENIED.
3
A separate ruling shall issue on a certificate of appealability.
4
Separate judgment shall issue consistent with this Order and with the R&R.
5
This action shall be TERMINATED and closed (JS-6).
6
7
8
9
Dated: Wednesday, May 24, 2017
____________________________________
VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK
SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?