Valadimir Parenago et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank et al

Filing 48

JUDGMENT 46 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. For the reasons more specifically set forth in the Court's Order Granting Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint 45 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT the First Amended Complaint of Plaintiffs Valadimir and Liubov Parenago ("Plaintiffs") is DISMISSED with prejudice, as to all defendants, and Plaintiffs shall take nothing from defendants by their First Amended Complaint. (lom)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

VALADIMIR PARENAGO, an
11 individual; LIUBOV PARENAGO, an
12 individual,

Case No. 2:16-cv-05243-AB-AS

13

Hon. André Birotte Jr.

14
15
16

Plaintiffs,

JUDGMENT

vs.
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18

For the reasons more specifically set forth in the Court’s Order Granting

19 Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint [D.E. #45],
20

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT the First Amended

21 Complaint of Plaintiffs Valadimir and Liubov Parenago (“Plaintiffs”) is DISMISSED
22 with prejudice, as to all defendants, and Plaintiffs shall take nothing from defendants
23 by their First Amended Complaint.
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27 Dated: November 14, 2016
28

Hon. André Birotte Jr.
JUDGMENT