Paz Gaming, Inc. v. RCD Holdings Ltd. et al
JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero: Defendant RCD is liable to Plaintiff PAZ in the amount of $560,000.00 due to RCDs interference with PAZs contract with DEQ. Plaintiff PAZ is awarded attorneys fees in the amount of $14,800.00Plaintiff is awarded its legal costs, in the amount of $1,307.00, in accordance with the Application to Tax Costs filed herein. (lc)
TREVOR J. ZINK, ESQ. (218860)
OMNI LAW GROUP, LLP
1940 Hamilton Avenue
San Jose, CA 95125
Tel: (408) 879-8500 / Fax: (408) 879-8501
April 26, 2017
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PAZ GAMING, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
IN AND FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PAZ GAMING, INC., a California
CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-05318-SJO-AS
RCD HOLDINGS LTD., an Australian
company; ANTHONY JAMES BROWN,
an individual; and DOES 1-100,
On April 14, 2017, the Court considered the application of Plaintiff PAZ GAMING, INC.
(“PAZ”) for a default judgment against Defendant RCD HOLDINGS LTD., an Australian
company (“RCD”), under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 55(b)(2) (the “Application”).
After considering the papers submitted in support of the Application, and the papers on
file in this action, the Court finds as follows:
Defendant RCD has failed to appear in this action by timely pleading or
responding to, or otherwise defending against, the complaint in this action after
being properly served with that complaint. Accordingly, the clerk entered default
against Defendant RCD on February 13, 2017.
Defendant RCD is a business entity and is not serving in the military, is not a
minor or incompetent person, is not an officer of agency of the United States, and
is not a foreign state or a political subdivision, agency, or instrumentality of a
Defendant RCD is liable to Plaintiff PAZ in the amount of $560,000.00 due to
RCD’s interference with PAZ’s contract with DEQ.
Plaintiff PAZ is awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $14,800.00
Plaintiff is awarded its legal costs, in the amount of $1,307.00, in accordance with
the Application to Tax Costs filed herein.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: April 26, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE JAMES S. OTERO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?