United States of America v. Real Property Located in Los Angeles, California

Filing 143

FIRST AMENDED CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE 142 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. (SEE CONSENT JUDGMENT FOR SPECIFICS). (jp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, Defendant. 16 No. CV 16-5378-DSF (PLA) FIRST AMENDED CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE [This Amended Consent Judgment is casedispositive] 17 ________________________________ ORIOLE DRIVE (LA) LLC, 18 19 Claimant. 20 21 Upon consideration of the First Amended Stipulation for the entry of this First 22 Amended Consent Judgment filed by the Plaintiff United States of America (“United 23 States”) and Claimant ORIOLE DRIVE (LA) LLC (“Claimant”) (collectively, together 24 with certain non-claimants who have agreed to be bound by this Judgment 1, the 25 26 27 28 1 The non-claimant parties to the Stipulation seeking entry of this First Amended Consent Judgment are FFP (Cayman) Limited, FFP Trustee (NZ) Limited, and FFP (Directors) Limited, FFP (Corporate Services) Limited (collectively, “FFP”); and (footnote cont’d on next page) 1 “Parties”), which First Amended Consent Judgment disposes of the entirety of this 2 action, the Court HEREBY finds that FFP has petitioned the foreign courts in the 3 relevant trust jurisdictions – New Zealand and/or Cayman Islands – for an order known 4 as a “blessing order”; such blessing order has been obtained; and that blessing order 5 authorizes FFP to forfeit or otherwise distribute the Defendant property or sales proceeds 6 of such property to the United States in accordance with the orders of this Court; nothing 7 precludes the Court from entering this First Amended Consent Judgment; and there is 8 good cause for entering the First Amended Consent Judgment; 9 WHEREFORE, the Court HEREBY ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES 10 that the Consent Judgment (Dkt. No. 141), incorporated herein by reference, is hereby 11 amended as follows: 12 13 14 15 1. All right, title, and interest in and to the Defendant Real Property more particularly described as: Parcel A of Parcel Map L.A. No. 3042, in the City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as per map filed in Book 69, Page 54 of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 APN: 5560-006-015 ADDRESS: 423 Oriole Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90069 (hereinafter the “ORIOLE Property”) is hereby forfeited to and title is vested in the United States; judgment is entered in favor of the United States; and any and all right, title, or interest in or to the ORIOLE Property, or claims or potential claims to the ORIOLE Property including those of ORIOLE DRIVE (LA) LLC, “FFP” and the “Low Family” are hereby released from the ORIOLE Property. 2. This Judgment shall serve as the Order transferring title to the ORIOLE Property from the titled owner ORIOLE DRIVE (LA) LLC to the United States. 26 27 28 beneficiaries Low Hock Peng, Goh Gaik Ewe, Low May Lin, Low Taek Szen, and Low Taek Jho (collectively, the “Low Family”). (Dkt. 139) 2 1 2 3. 4. The Amended Order for Interlocutory Sale of the ORIOLE Property (Dkt. law. 3 4 The United States shall dispose of the ORIOLE Property in accordance with No. 136) is hereby vacated, with the exception of the following: a. 5 The existing Listing Agreement dated December 4, 2019 to sell the 6 ORIOLE Property entered into by Colliers International Greater Los 7 Angeles, Inc. with Douglas Elliman of California, Inc. (ERNIE 8 CARSWELL, Broker) shall remain in effect through February 29, 2020; b. 9 Although there is no existing sale contract for the ORIOLE Property, if 10 negotiations are taking place for the sale of the ORIOLE Property to a 11 prospective purchaser prior to February 29, 2020, then the existing Listing 12 Agreement shall be extended until the sale with that purchaser closes or it 13 appears that the contract has fallen out of escrow or will not close; c. 14 The sale proceeds of the ORIOLE Property, except the “net proceeds”, shall 15 be determined and distributed in accordance with Paragraph 8 of the 16 Amended Interlocutory Sale Order, (Dkt. No. 136), incorporated herein by 17 reference, including the payment by Claimant of the “Claimant Property 18 Taxes” and “Claimant Costs and Expenses” as defined in Paragraph 8; and d. 19 The “net proceeds” as that term is defined in Paragraph 8(e) shall be disposed of by the USMS in accordance with the law. 20 5. 21 The terms of this First Amended Consent Judgment shall control in the 22 event of any alleged conflict with any prior Stipulation or Order filed or entered in this 23 action, including, without limitation, the Amended Interlocutory Sale Order (Dkt. 136), 24 the Stipulation to Enter Consent Judgment (Dkt. 139) and the Consent Judgment of 25 Forfeiture (Dkt. 141). 26 // 27 // 28 3 1 6. All other terms of the Consent Judgment (Dkt. No. 141) remain unchanged. 2 7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this order. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 DATED: February 28, 2020 5 Honorable Dale S. Fischer UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 PRESENTED BY: DEBORAH CONNOR Chief, MLARS NICOLA T. HANNA United States Attorney STEVEN R. WELK Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Asset Forfeiture Section /s/ Michael R. Sew Hoy MICHAEL R. SEW HOY JOHN J. KUCERA Assistant United States Attorneys WOO S. LEE Deputy Chief, MLARS Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?