Bruce White v. State of California et al

Filing 135

JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that plaintiff Bruce White shall take nothing by reason of his Second Amended Complaint on file herein, that defendants State of California, acting by and through the Califor nia Highway Patrol, Matthew Fetch and Cory Villars shall have judgment against Plaintiff, that the Second Amended Complaint shall be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice, and that defendants shall be entitled to statutory costs of suit pursuant to a timely filed Bill of Costs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and Local Rule 54-2, et seq. Related to: Jury Verdict 132 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)

JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Case No. CV 16-5493-GW(ASx)

BRUCE WHITE, AN INDIVIDUAL,

JUDGMENT

Plaintiff,

Judge: The Honorable George H. Wu
Trial Date: May 22, 2018

v.
OFFICER FETCH, ET AL.,
Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23

This matter came on regularly for trial on May 22, 2018, in Courtroom 9D of
the above-entitled court before the Honorable George H. Wu, Judge Presiding.
Ephraim O. Obi appeared for plaintiff Bruce White. Deputy Attorney

24

General Paul C. Epstein of the Office of the California Attorney General appeared

25

for defendants State of California, acting by and through the California Highway

26
27
28

Patrol, Matthew Fetch and Cory Villars.
A jury was empaneled and sworn on May 22, 2018. Witnesses were sworn
1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

and examined and documentary evidence was received. Following instruction and
closing arguments, the jury began its deliberations on May 24, 2018. On May 25,
2018, the jury returned the following verdict:
I.

42 U.S.C. § 1983 -Violation of Constitutional Rights

A.

Did Defendants Cory Villars or Matthew Fetch arrest Plaintiff Bruce

8

White without having probable cause to believe Plaintiff had: (1) resisted arrest

9

under California Penal Code § 148(a)(1), (2) kidnapped a person in violation of

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Penal Code §§ 207/208, or (3) committed a lewd act on a child age 15 in violation
of Penal Code §288(c)(1).
____Yes
B.

X

No

Did either Cory Villars or Matthew Fetch use excessive force in

detaining or arresting Plaintiff Bruce White?
____Yes

X

No

II.

State Claims

A.

Did either Cory Villars or Matthew Fetch commit an act of violence on

Plaintiff Bruce White where a substantial motivating factor for the officer’s conduct
was his perception of Plaintiff’s race?
____Yes

X

No

25
26
27
28
2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

B.

Did either Cory Villars or Matthew Fetch engage in act(s) of

“outrageous conduct” intending to cause Plaintiff emotional distress which did
cause Plaintiff to suffer severe emotional distress?
____Yes

X

No

If the jury’s answer to any of the above questions is “Yes,” there will be

8

additional follow-up questions from the Court.

9

Dated: May 25, 2018

/s/ Presiding Juror

10
11
12
13
14
15

WHEREFORE, BY REASON OF THE AFORESAID, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that plaintiff Bruce White shall take
nothing by reason of his Second Amended Complaint on file herein, that defendants

16

State of California, acting by and through the California Highway Patrol, Matthew

17

Fetch and Cory Villars shall have judgment against Plaintiff, that the Second

18
19

Amended Complaint shall be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice, and that

20

defendants shall be entitled to statutory costs of suit pursuant to a timely filed Bill

21

of Costs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and Local Rule 54-2, et seq.

22
23
24
25

Dated: June 11, 2018

________________________________
GEORGE H. WU, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

26
27
28
3