Cori Hill v. Designed Receivables Solutions, Inc.

Filing 41

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 38 by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Having reviewed the Plaintiff Cori Hill and Defendant Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc.'s Proposed Stipulated Confidentiality and Protective Order, and having found good cause therein, the Court hereby GRANTS' the Parties' Request for a Confidentiality and Protective Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. (kl)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Douglas B. Vanderpool, Esq. (SBN 162857) Heather A. Tovar, Esq. (SBN 237004) THE VANDERPOOL LAW FIRM 330 Main Street, Suite 203B Seal Beach, CA 90740 Tel: 562.431.6900; Fax: 714.276.0558 doug@vanderpool-law.com heather@vanderpool-law.com Attorneys for Defendant, Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CORI HILL, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 v. DESIGNED RECEIVABLE SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant. 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:16-cv-05621 CBM (JEMx) Assigned for All Purposes to the Hon. Consuelo B. Marshall Dept. 8B ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER Complaint Filed: FAC Filed: 7/28/16 9/27/16 18 19 Having reviewed the Plaintiff Cori Hill and Defendant Designed Receivable 20 21 22 23 24 Solutions, Inc.’s Proposed Stipulated Confidentiality and Protective Order, and having found good cause therein, the Court hereby GRANTS’ the Parties’ Request for a Confidentiality and Protective Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 Dated: May 25, 2017 _________________________________________ Hon. John E. McDermott UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 ORDER [2:16-cv-05621 CBM (JEMx)] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL (C.C.P. §§ 1013a and 2015.5) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE I am employed by the law office of Douglas B. Vanderpool in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the above-captioned action. My business address is 330 Main Street, Suite 203-B, Seal Beach, CA 90740. On May 18, 2017, I served a copy of the attached documents entitled: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER on the interested parties in this action as follows: Amy Ginsburg Rachel Stevens Kimmel & Silverman, P.C. 30 East Butler Pike Ambler, PA 19002 aginsburg@creditlaw.com rstevens@creditlaw.com [] BY MAIL: By placing a true and correct copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed as above, with postage thereon fully prepared, in the U.S. Mail at Seal Beach, California. I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal service on the same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Seal Beach, California, in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing as stated in the affidavit. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 [XX] BY ELECTRONIC MAIL: I personally sent the attached document from my e-mail account, heather@vanderpool-law.com to the recipient’s e-mail account set forth in the service list. I did not receive any electronic transmission or other message within a reasonable time that the delivery was unsuccessful. [ ] BY PERSONAL SERVICE: I caused such envelope to be delivered by hand to the offices of the addressee(s). [] (State) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. [XX] (Federal) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. 24 Executed on May 18, 2017 at Seal Beach, California. 25 /s/ Heather A. Tovar 26 Heather Tovar 27 28 -1PROOF OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?