Thomas Xulu v. M. E. Spearman
Filing
32
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ("Petition"), all of the recor ds herein, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report") 26 , and Petitioner's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("Objections"). Having completed its revie w, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is DENIED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. 25 (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION) (gr)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
NO. CV 16-5738-PSG(KS)
THOMAS XULU,
11
Petitioner,
12
.
v
13
14
M.E. SPEARMAN, Warden,
15
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Respondent.
16
17
18
19
20
21
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus ("Petition"), all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and Petitioner's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's
Report and Recommendation ("Objections"). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed.
23
R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to
which objections have been stated. Having completed its review, the Court accepts the
24
indings and recommendations set forth in the Report.
f
25
\\
2
6
\\
27
\\
28
\\
22
1
2
(2) Judgment
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is DENIED; and
shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2
0
21
22
23
2
4
25
2
6
27
28
DATED:
~/~ f7
`
PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?