Fifty-Six Hope Road Music Limited et al v. Jammin Java Corporation et al
Filing
148
FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Stephen V. Wilson Related to: Order on Motion for Damages, 146 . The Court, in an Order dated May 30, 2017 (Dkt. No. 146), granted Plaintiffs' Motion for Award of Damages in the amount of $2,458,835.20. NOW, THE REFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. Pursuant to the Court's Orders of January 25, 2017 (Dkt. No. 97), February 15, 2017 (Dkt. No. 188), February 22, 2017 (Dkt. No. 122), and May 30, 2017 (Dkt. No. 146), judgment is entered again st Defendant JJ and in favor of Plaintiffs on Plaintiffs' First, Second, Third, Fourth, and Sixth Claims for Relief. 2. Plaintiffs are awarded damages in the amount of $2,829,994.36, which consists of: (see document for details). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
1900 Avenue of the Stars, 21st Floor
Los Angeles, California 90067-4590
GREENBERG GLUSKER FIELDS CLAMAN
& MACHTINGER LLP
9
WESTERN DIVISION
12
13
14
15
FIFTY-SIX HOPE ROAD MUSIC
LIMITED, a Bahamian corporation, and
HOPE ROAD MERCHANDISING,
LLC, a Florida limited liability
company,
Plaintiffs,
16
17
Case No. 2:16-cv-05810-SVW-MRW
[Assigned to:
Hon. Stephen V. Wilson]
FINAL JUDGMENT
JS-6
v.
18
JAMMIN JAVA CORPORATION, a
Nevada corporation, and DOES 1-10,
19
Defendants.
20
On September 20, 2016, Plaintiffs Fifty-Six Hope Road Music Limited
21
(“56HR”) and Hope Road Merchandising, LLC (“HRM”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”)
22
filed their First Amended Complaint against Defendant Jammin Java Corporation
23
(“JJ”) for Breach of Contract as to the parties’ Long and Short Term Licenses,
24
Declaratory Relief as to the parties’ Long and Short Term Licenses, Interference
25
with Prospective Economic Advantage, Trademark Infringement, Accounting,
26
Fraud-Misrepresentation, and Indemnification.
27
On September 26, 2016, Defendant JJ filed its Answer and Counterclaims
28
28219-00007/2806287.2
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
1
2
3
4
against Plaintiffs and Third-Party Complaint against Rohan Marley.
On November 22, 2016, Defendant JJ filed its Third Amended Counterclaims
against Plaintiffs.
On December 12, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Partial Summary
5
Judgment as to Plaintiffs’ First and Third Claims for Relief and Defendant JJ’s First
6
through Sixth and Ninth Counterclaims for Relief. The hearing on that Motion was
7
held before the Honorable Stephen V. Wilson, United States District Court Judge,
8
presiding, on January 23, 2017.
The Court, in an Order dated January 25, 2017 (Dkt. No. 97), granted
10
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment with respect to Plaintiffs’ First
11
1900 Avenue of the Stars, 21st Floor
Los Angeles, California 90067-4590
GREENBERG GLUSKER FIELDS CLAMAN
& MACHTINGER LLP
9
and Third Claims for Relief, as well as with respect to Defendant’s First, Second,
12
Third, and Fourth Counterclaims.
13
On February 3, 2017, Defendant JJ filed a Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of
14
Defendant’s Counterclaims. The hearing on that Motion was held before the
15
Honorable Stephen V. Wilson, United States District Court Judge, presiding, on
16
February 15, 2017.
17
18
19
The Court, in an Order dated February 15, 2017 (Dkt. No. 118), dismissed all
of Defendant JJ’s Counterclaims with prejudice.
On February 10, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a second Motion for Partial Summary
20
Judgment as to Plaintiffs’ Second and Fourth Claims for Relief. The hearing on
21
that Motion was held before the Honorable Stephen V. Wilson, United States
22
District Court Judge, presiding, on February 15, 2017.
23
24
The Court, in an Order dated February 22, 2017 (Dkt. No. 122), granted
Plaintiffs’ second Motion for Partial Summary Judgment in its entirety.
25
Pursuant to the Court’s Order of February 21, 2017 (Dkt. No. 121),
26
Plaintiffs’ filed a Motion for Award of Damages for trademark infringement on
27
April 7, 2017. The hearing on that Motion was held before the Honorable Stephen
28
V. Wilson, United States District Court Judge, presiding, on May 15, 2017.
28219-00007/2806287.2
2
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
1
The Court, in an Order dated May 30, 2017 (Dkt. No. 146), granted
2
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Award of Damages in the amount of $2,458,835.20.
3
4
5
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED
that:
1.
Pursuant to the Court’s Orders of January 25, 2017 (Dkt. No. 97),
6
February 15, 2017 (Dkt. No. 188), February 22, 2017 (Dkt. No. 122), and May 30,
7
2017 (Dkt. No. 146), judgment is entered against Defendant JJ and in favor of
8
Plaintiffs on Plaintiffs’ First, Second, Third, Fourth, and Sixth Claims for Relief.
10
2.
Plaintiffs are awarded damages in the amount of $2,829,994.36, which
consists of:
11
1900 Avenue of the Stars, 21st Floor
Los Angeles, California 90067-4590
GREENBERG GLUSKER FIELDS CLAMAN
& MACHTINGER LLP
9
a.
$371,159.16 in unpaid royalties awarded pursuant to the Court’s
12
Orders of January 25, 2017 (Dkt. No. 97) and February 22, 2017
13
(Dkt. No. 122); and
14
b.
$2,458,835.20 awarded as a measure of damages for JJ’s
15
trademark infringement pursuant to the Court’s Order of May
16
30, 2017 (Dkt. No. 146).
17
3.
As the prevailing parties, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1),
18
Plaintiffs are entitled to recover prejudgment costs from JJ in the amount of
19
Application to Tax Costs
______________, pursuant to a separately filed Memorandum of Costs.
To be determined by
20
4.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(2), Plaintiffs are entitled to recover
21
their reasonable attorney’s fees and related nontaxable expenses from JJ in the
22
Motion for Attorneys Fees
amount of ______________, pursuant to a separately filed motion.
To be determined by
23
24
25
26
27
28
5.
Pursuant to the Court’s Order on February 15, 2017 (Dkt. No. 118), all
of Defendant’s Counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice.
6.
Plaintiffs’ Fifth, Seventh, Eighth, and Ninth Claims for Relief are
dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 8, 2017
H
Hon. S h V Wil
Stephen V. Wilson
United States District Court Judge
28219-00007/2806287.2
3
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?