James G Garcia v. Robert W Fox

Filing 19

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of United States Magistrate Judge by Judge John F. Walter: Under 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistr ate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered summarily denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (lwag)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 JAMES G. GARCIA, 12 Petitioner, 13 v. 14 ROBERT W. FOX, 15 Respondent. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 16-5837-JFW (DFM) Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 17 18 Under 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the petition, the records 19 on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 20 Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of 21 the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The 22 Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 2 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered summarily denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. 3 4 Dated: February 8, 2017 ______________________________ JOHN F. WALTER United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?