James G Garcia v. Robert W Fox
Filing
19
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of United States Magistrate Judge by Judge John F. Walter: Under 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistr ate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered summarily denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (lwag)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WESTERN DIVISION
11
JAMES G. GARCIA,
12
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
ROBERT W. FOX,
15
Respondent.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 16-5837-JFW (DFM)
Order Accepting Findings and
Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge
17
18
Under 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the petition, the records
19
on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate
20
Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of
21
the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The
22
Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered summarily
denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.
3
4
Dated: February 8, 2017
______________________________
JOHN F. WALTER
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?