Michele Ann Hurley v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Filing 32

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 31 . Pursuant to the Stipulation between the parties, through their respective counsel, awarding attorneys fees under EAJA, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that EAJA fees are awarded in the amount of $4,450.00, subject to the terms of the stipulation. (bem)

Download PDF
4 JANNA K. LOWENSTEIN (SBN 225371) Lowenstein Disability Lawyers, A.L.C. 25350 Magic Mountain Pkwy Suite 300 Valencia, CA 91355 Tel: (818) 905 6611 Fax: (818) 789 1375 Email: jklowenstein@yahoo.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 1 2 3 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 MICHELE ANN HURLEY ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ) NANCY A. BERRYHILL1, ACTING COMMISSIONER ) OF SOCIAL SECURITY ) ) Defendant ) _________________________ ) 17 18 CASE NO. CV 16-cv-5892 (JPR) ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 Pursuant to the Stipulation between the parties, through their respective counsel, awarding attorney’s fees under EAJA, 19 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 20 $4,450.00, subject to the terms of the stipulation. 21 Dated: November 16, 2017 22 23 EAJA fees are awarded in the amount of ________________________ _______________________________________ JEAN ROSENBLUTH U.S. Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 1Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 28 1 Order Awarding EAJA Fees

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?