Michele Ann Hurley v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
32
ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 31 . Pursuant to the Stipulation between the parties, through their respective counsel, awarding attorneys fees under EAJA, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that EAJA fees are awarded in the amount of $4,450.00, subject to the terms of the stipulation. (bem)
4
JANNA K. LOWENSTEIN (SBN 225371)
Lowenstein Disability Lawyers, A.L.C.
25350 Magic Mountain Pkwy Suite 300
Valencia, CA 91355
Tel: (818) 905 6611
Fax: (818) 789 1375
Email: jklowenstein@yahoo.com
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
1
2
3
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
MICHELE ANN HURLEY
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
NANCY A. BERRYHILL1,
ACTING COMMISSIONER )
OF SOCIAL SECURITY
)
)
Defendant
)
_________________________ )
17
18
CASE NO. CV 16-cv-5892 (JPR)
ORDER AWARDING
ATTORNEYS FEES PURSUANT TO
EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS,
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920
Pursuant to the Stipulation between the parties, through their respective counsel,
awarding attorney’s fees under EAJA,
19
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that
20
$4,450.00, subject to the terms of the stipulation.
21
Dated:
November 16, 2017
22
23
EAJA fees are awarded in the amount of
________________________
_______________________________________
JEAN ROSENBLUTH
U.S. Magistrate Judge
24
25
26
27
1Nancy
A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner
Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit
by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
28
1
Order Awarding EAJA Fees
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?