Strategic Partners Inc. v. Vestagen Protective Technologies Inc.

Filing 257

FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Refer to the document for details. (pso)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION

8
9 STRATEGIC PARTNERS, INC.,
10
Plaintiff,
11

Case No.: 2:16-CV-5900-RGK
Judge: Hon. R. Gary Klausner
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT

vs.
Trial Date: September 19, 2017
VESTAGEN PROTECTIVE
Complaint Filed: August 8, 2016
13 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Counterclaims Filed: September 19, 2016
14
Defendant.
15
VESTAGEN PROTECTIVE
16 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
17
Counterclaim Plaintiff,
18
vs.
19
STRATEGIC PARTNERS, INC.,
20
Counterclaim Defendant.
21
12

22
23 ///
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
4843-7536-1874

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment be entered on the complaint of Plaintiff

2 Strategic Partners, Inc. for false advertising in violation of 15 U.S.C. section 1125(a),
3 unfair business practices in violation of California Business & Professions Code section
4 17200, and untrue and misleading advertising in violation of California Business &
5 Professions Code section 17500 in favor of Defendant Vestagen Protective Technologies,
6 Inc. and against Strategic Partners, Inc.
7

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that judgment be entered on the

8 counterclaim of Counterclaimant Vestagen Protective Technologies for false advertising in
9 violation of 15 U.S.C. Section 1125(a), breach of contract, and misappropriation of trade
10 secrets in favor of Counterclaim Defendant Strategic Partners, Inc and against
11 Counterclaimant Vestagen Protective Technologies, Inc.
12

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will decide the issues of

13 costs and attorneys’ fees after review of the parties’ submissions on these issues.
14
15
16 Date: November 20, 2017

_______________________________

17

Hon. R. Gary Klausner

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT