XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. v. Ginger Galvez

Filing 111

ORDER Re Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice 109 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald that the above-referenced action (including all of Plaintiff's Complaint and all of Defendant Counterclaims) be and hereby is dismissed in its entirety, with p rejudice. This dismissal is not intended to have any preclusive effect on the claims asserted by XPO in the separate action entitled XPO CNW, Inc., et al. v. R and L Carriers, Inc., et al., United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, Case No. 2:16-cv-10391-RHCSDD. Each party shall bear his or its own costs and attorneys fees. This Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties settlement agreement. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

1

JS-6

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION

10

XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC.

CASE NO. 2:16-cv-05915 MWF (AFMx)

Delaware corporation,

[ORDER RE STIPULATION OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

11 (formerly Con-Way Freight, Inc.), a
12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
v.

Date Action Filed: August 8, 2016

GINGER GALVEZ, an individual,
Defendant.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

ORDER RE: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

1

Pursuant to the parties’ “Stipulation of Dismissal of Action With Prejudice,”

2 and their related written settlement agreement, with good cause appearing therefore,
3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-referenced action (including all of
4 Plaintiff’s Complaint and all of Defendant’s Counterclaims) be and hereby is
5 dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. This dismissal is not intended to have any
6 preclusive effect on the claims asserted by XPO in the separate action entitled XPO
7 CNW, Inc., et al. v. R&L Carriers, Inc., et al., United States District Court for the
8 Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, Case No. 2:16-cv-10391-RHC9 SDD. Each party shall bear his or its own costs and attorneys’ fees. This Court will
10 retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement.
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED

13
14

Dated: December 4, 2017

Hon. Michael W. Fitzgerald

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

ORDER RE: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE