Brighton Collectibles, LLC v. IPPO Jewelry Corp et al

Filing 47

PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Pursuant to the settlement agreement and Stipulation of the parties 46 , the Court hereby permanently enjoins defendant IPPO Jewelry Corp. ("IPPO"), as well as I PPO's servants, employees, agents, representatives, and all persons or entities in active concert or participation with IPPO, from designing, manufacturing, importing, shipping, delivering, selling, marketing, displaying, advertising, or promoti ng any products that incorporate designs that are substantially similar to Plaintiff's Love Affair Heart copyright, VA 1-929-721. All claims in this action are hereby dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (gk)

JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

11
12 BRIGHTON COLLECTIBLES, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,
13
Plaintiff,
14
vs.
15
IPPO JEWELRY CORP, a New York
16 corporation and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,
17
Defendants.
18

Case No. 2:16-cv-06065-AB (JEMx)
Hon. André Birotte Jr.
Magistrate John E. McDermott
[PROPOSED] PERMANENT
INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
979627 1

Case No. 2:16-cv-06065-AB (JEMx)
PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

1

PERMANENT INJUNCTION
Pursuant to the settlement agreement and stipulation of the parties, the Court

2

3 hereby permanently enjoins defendant IPPO Jewelry Corp. (“IPPO”), as well as
4 IPPO’s servants, employees, agents, representatives, and all persons or entities in
5 active concert or participation with IPPO, from designing, manufacturing,
6 importing, shipping, delivering, selling, marketing, displaying, advertising, or
7 promoting any products that incorporate designs that are substantially similar to
8 Plaintiff’s Love Affair Heart copyright, VA 1-929-721.
9

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Except as provided herein, all claims in this action are hereby dismissed with

10

11 prejudice, each party to bear its own costs.
The Court hereby retains jurisdiction to enforce compliance with this

12

13 injunction and the parties’ settlement agreement. Upon motion, this action may be
14 reopened for said purpose.
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.

16
17 DATED: December 19, 2017
18
19
André Birotte Jr
United States District Judge

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
979627 1

Case No. 2:16-cv-06065-AB (JEMx)
-1PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE