Marcus Morris v. Sammy Sabbagh et al

Filing 51

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF SAMMY SABBAGH ON PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, Related to: Order on Motion for Summary Judgment 49 . Now, therefore, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff Marcus Morris shall have and recover nothing by reason of each and all of the claims set forth in his First Amended Complaint against Sammy Sabbagh. Sammy Sabbagh shall recover costs in accordance with Local Rule 54(d). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MARCUS MORRIS,

Case No.: 2:16-cv-06080-SVW (PLAx)

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16
17
18

(Hon. Stephen V. Wilson)

vs.

JS-6

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF
SAMMY SABBAGH ON
PLAINTIFF’S FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT

SAMMY SABBAGH, Los Angeles
County Sheriff Deputy; and DOES 3-5,
Inclusive,

Action Filed: August 15, 2016
Defendants.

19
20
21

Defendant, SAMMY SABBAGH, filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on

22

Plaintiff, MARCUS MORRIS’S First Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal

23

Rules of Civil Procedure 56 (c). [Dkt. 40].

24

Upon consideration of the moving papers, all declarations and exhibits

25

submitted therewith, and the entire case file, the Court GRANTED the motion of

26

defendant SABBAGH in a written order dated October 18, 2017. [Dkt. 49]. The

27

Court found that Plaintiff had not made an adequate showing on either of his

28

claims. Accordingly, Sammy Sabbagh is entitled to summary judgment on both the
-1-