Cassandra Sliwoski v. Sedgwick CMS et al

Filing 38

ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge S. James Otero, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 37 . Pursuant to the parties' Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of Action With Prejudice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (smo)

1

4

MATTHEW P. EASTUS, State Bar No. 187747
Southern California Edison Law Department
2244 Walnut Grove Avenue, 3rd Floor
Rosemead, CA 91770
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]

5

Attorneys for Defendants

2
3

JS-6

May 24, 2017

6

VC
P

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

CASSANDRA SLIWOSKI,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
SEDGWICK CMS; SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY; )
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON )
)
COMPANY LONG TERM
)
DISABILITY PLAN; DOES 1 - 10,
)
inclusive,
)
Defendants.
)
)
)

CASE NO. 16-CV-6096 SJO (AGRx)
Judge: Hon. S. James Otero
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Complaint filed: Aug. 16, 2016

22

Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of Action With

23

Prejudice, IT IS HEREBYORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice

24

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each

25

party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

26
27

SIGNED on this 24th day of May, 2017.

_______________________
United States District Judge

28
___________________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE