Cassandra Sliwoski v. Sedgwick CMS et al

Filing 38

ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge S. James Otero, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 37 . Pursuant to the parties' Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of Action With Prejudice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (smo)

Download PDF
1 4 MATTHEW P. EASTUS, State Bar No. 187747 Southern California Edison Law Department 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue, 3rd Floor Rosemead, CA 91770 Tel: (626) 302-4947 Fax: (626) 302-1910 E-Mail: matthew.eastus@sce.com 5 Attorneys for Defendants 2 3 JS-6 May 24, 2017 6 VC P 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 CASSANDRA SLIWOSKI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SEDGWICK CMS; SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY; ) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ) ) COMPANY LONG TERM ) DISABILITY PLAN; DOES 1 - 10, ) inclusive, ) Defendants. ) ) ) CASE NO. 16-CV-6096 SJO (AGRx) Judge: Hon. S. James Otero ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Complaint filed: Aug. 16, 2016 22 Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Stipulation of Dismissal of Action With 23 Prejudice, IT IS HEREBYORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice 24 pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each 25 party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 26 27 SIGNED on this 24th day of May, 2017. _______________________ United States District Judge 28 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?