Albert Kirakosian et al v. J and L D Sunset Wholesale and Tobacco et al
Filing
9
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, SEIZURE ORDER, AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court is in receipt of plaintiffs' application requesting a temporary restraini ng order ("TRO"), a seizure order, and a preliminary injunction 8 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: (1) Plaintiffs' request for a temporary restraining order is DENIED without prejudice. (2) Plaintiffs' request for an order of seizure is D ENIED without prejudice. (3) Plaintiffs' request for a preliminary injunction is DENIED without prejudice, subject to being renewed on motion for preliminary injunction upon a showing that the proper service of process has been completed. Court Eeporter: Not Present. (gk)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
‘O’
Case No.
2:16-cv-06097-CAS(PLAx)
Title
ALBERT KIRAKOSIAN AND KIRAKO, LLC v. J&L SUNSET
WHOLESALE & TOBACCO ET AL.
Present: The Honorable
Date
September 16, 2016
CHRISTINA A. SNYDER
Catherine Jeang
Deputy Clerk
Not Present
Court Reporter / Recorder
N/A
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Not Present
Not Present
Proceedings:
(IN CHAMBERS) - PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION FOR
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, SEIZURE ORDER,
AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Dkt. 8, filed September 14,
2016)
The Court is in receipt of plaintiffs’ application requesting a temporary restraining
order (“TRO”), a seizure order, and a preliminary injunction. Dkt. 8.
Plaintiffs have not demonstrated proof of personal service of the summons,
complaint, or application on defendants. Plaintiffs have failed to show that the evidence
weighs in favor of granting the extraordinary relief sought by plaintiffs before defendants
have been properly served in this matter. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(1). Plaintiffs also
failed to apprise the courtroom deputy of the application for a TRO pursuant to Local
Rule 77-1. Having reviewed plaintiffs’ application, the Court concludes as follows.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
(1)
Plaintiff’s request for a temporary restraining order is DENIED without
prejudice.
(2)
Plaintiff’s request for an order of seizure is DENIED without prejudice
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
2:16-cv-06097-CAS(PLAx)
Title
ALBERT KIRAKOSIAN AND KIRAKO, LLC v. J&L SUNSET
WHOLESALE & TOBACCO ET AL.
(3)
Date
‘O’
September 16, 2016
Plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction is DENIED without
prejudice, subject to being renewed on motion for preliminary injunction
upon a showing that the proper service of process has been completed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
00
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
:
00
CMJ
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?