Venice Baking Company v. Sophast Sales and Marketing LLC et al

Filing 30

JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff shall recover nothing from Defendant, and its claims against Defendant are dismissed on the merits and with prejudice. Defendant shall recover costs from Plaintiff as evidenced by a bill ofcosts. (lc)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 CASE CLOSED 6 United States District Court Central District of California 7 8 9 10 VENICE BAKING COMPANY, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 2:16-cv-6136-ODW(KS) v. JUDGMENT SOPHAST SALES AND MARKETING LLC, a Maryland Limited Liability Company; and DOES 1–10, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 18 On May 4, 2016, Plaintiff Venice Baking Company filed a complaint in the 19 Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles against Defendant Sophast Sales 20 and Marketing LLC seeking declaratory relief. (Compl. ¶¶ 17–27, ECF No. 1-1.) 21 Defendant removed the case to federal court on August 16, 2016. (ECF No. 1.) On 22 September 19, 2016, the Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss with prejudice. 23 (ECF No. 11.) 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: 2 1. 3 Defendant are dismissed on the merits and with prejudice; 2. 4 5 Plaintiff shall recover nothing from Defendant, and its claims against Defendant shall recover costs from Plaintiff as evidenced by a bill of costs. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 January 26, 2017 9 10 11 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?