Venice Baking Company v. Sophast Sales and Marketing LLC et al
Filing
30
JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff shall recover nothing from Defendant, and its claims against Defendant are dismissed on the merits and with prejudice. Defendant shall recover costs from Plaintiff as evidenced by a bill ofcosts. (lc)
1
2
3
4
5
CASE CLOSED
6
United States District Court
Central District of California
7
8
9
10
VENICE BAKING COMPANY,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 2:16-cv-6136-ODW(KS)
v.
JUDGMENT
SOPHAST SALES AND MARKETING
LLC, a Maryland Limited Liability
Company; and DOES 1–10, inclusive,
16
Defendants.
17
18
On May 4, 2016, Plaintiff Venice Baking Company filed a complaint in the
19
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles against Defendant Sophast Sales
20
and Marketing LLC seeking declaratory relief. (Compl. ¶¶ 17–27, ECF No. 1-1.)
21
Defendant removed the case to federal court on August 16, 2016. (ECF No. 1.) On
22
September 19, 2016, the Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss with prejudice.
23
(ECF No. 11.)
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:
2
1.
3
Defendant are dismissed on the merits and with prejudice;
2.
4
5
Plaintiff shall recover nothing from Defendant, and its claims against
Defendant shall recover costs from Plaintiff as evidenced by a bill of
costs.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
January 26, 2017
9
10
11
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?