Maria Hernandez v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
17
JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, Related to: Stipulation to Remand Case to US Agency 15 . The Court having approved the parties' Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment ("Stipulation of Remand") lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation of Remand. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mp)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
EILEEN M. DECKER
United States Attorney
DOROTHY A. SCHOUTEN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Civil Division
ROBYN-MARIE LYON MONTELEONE
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, General Civil Section
PAUL SACHELARI, CSBN 230082
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
160 Spear St., Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8933
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
Email: paul.sachelari@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
14
15
16
MARIA HERNANDEZ,
17
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
21
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
22
Defendant.
23
24
) No. 2:16-cv-06180-AGR
)
)
) JUDGMENT OF REMAND
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand
25
Pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (“Stipulation
26
of Remand”) lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand.
27
28
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the abovecaptioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further
///
1
proceedings consistent with the Stipulation of Remand.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATED: December 29, 2016
HON. ALICIA G. ROSENBERG
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?