Roderick D Hall v. CSP Los Angeles County et al
Filing
27
ORDER Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all the records and files herein, along with the Report and Recommen dation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the First Amended Complaint without leave to amend. (dro)
1
2
O
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
RODERICK D. HALL,
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
CSP-LOS ANGELES, et al.,
14
Case No. CV 16-6216-RGK (KES)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
Defendant.
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
17
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all the
18
records and files herein, along with the Report and Recommendation of the United
19
States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of
20
those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been
21
made. The Court accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the
22
United States Magistrate Judge.
23
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the
24
First Amended Complaint without leave to amend.
25
DATED: May 12, 2017
26
27
28
____________________________________
R. GARY KLAUSNER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?