U.S. Bank National Association v. Ocean Towers Housing Corporation et al
Filing
108
JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (SEE JUDGMENT FOR SPECIFICS). (jp)
JS-6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
U.S. BANK N.A.,
Plaintiff,
v.
CV 16-6251 DSF (Ex)
JUDGMENT
OCEAN TOWERS HOUSING
CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
The Court having granted Plaintiff U.S. Bank N.A.’s motion for
summary adjudication (1) in favor of its breach of contract claim
against Ocean Towers Housing Corporation (OTHC), (2) in favor of its
claim for declaratory relief, and (3) against Defendant Seif Ascar’s
counterclaim to quiet title and having dismissed all other claims at
Plaintiff’s request,
IT IS DECLARED:
1. The judgment for unlawful detainer entered against defendants
Omar Spahi individually and as Trustee of the Cacciatore Trust
and Bella Ragazza Trust and John Spahi, as Trustee of the Spahi
Family Trust in the matter Ocean Towers Housing Corporation v.
Omar Spahi, et al., Case No. 13R05991 (Superior Court of
California, County of Los Angeles) is set aside. USB’s security
interest in Unit 1601-B in Ocean Towers, as evidenced by the
First Capital Deed of Trust, recorded with the Recorder’s Office of
Los Angeles County as document number 05-3225312, was
unaffected by the unlawful detainer judgment and remains viable
and enforceable against Unit 1601-B.
2. OTHC was not entitled to terminate the lease or cancel the
shares of OTHC stock issued to Fadila Spahi associated with
Unit 1601-B in Ocean Towers (Share Certificate No. 1409). Any
purported termination of the lease and cancellation of shares is
void and has no effect. Therefore, the transfer of any interest in
Unit 1601-B, including the transfer of shares of capital stock of
OTHC purportedly issued after entry of the void unlawful
detainer judgment, from OTHC to The Breeze Trust, or any other
person or entity, is also void.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Seif Ascar and
the Breeze Trust are not entitled to quiet title on Unit 1601-B and are
not bona fide purchasers of the unit for value.
Plaintiff is to recover costs of suit pursuant to a bill of costs filed in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1920.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: October 25, 2019
___________________________
Dale S. Fischer
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?