Rahim Multani v. Pro Value Properties, Inc. et al
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause re Sanctions by Judge Dale S. Fischer. REFER TO THE COURT'S ORDER FOR SPECIFICS. (pso)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MEMORANDUM
Case No.
Title
CV 16-6400 DSF (RAOx)
Date
10/5/17
Rahim Multani v. Pro Value Properties, Inc., et al.
Present:
The Honorable
DALE S. FISCHER, United States District Judge
Debra Plato
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs
Attorneys Present for Defendants
Not Present
Not Present
Not Present
Proceedings:
(In Chambers) Order to Show Cause re Sanctions
On September 22, 2017, this Court issued an Order stating:
Plaintiff’s complete failure to cooperate with discovery provides good cause to
amend the scheduling order as to Defendants’ discovery. The motion is
GRANTED. Defendants are to file a joint request for new scheduling dates with a
proposed order no later than September 29, 2017.
On September 29, 2017, defense counsel submitted a Unilateral Request to
Continue Scheduling Dates, along with a Declaration stating that Mr. Sayegh failed to
cooperate in connection with providing a joint request for dates. This is not the first time
Mr. Sayegh has failed to act professionally or to comply with Court orders. Mr. Sayegh
is ordered to show cause in writing no later than October 11, 2017 why he should not be
sanctioned in the amount of $250 for his failure to comply with this Court’s Orders. A
hearing on the Order to Show Cause is set for October 16, 2017 at 11:00 a.m. Payment
of $250 to the Clerk of the Court by October 13, 2017 will be deemed compliance with
this Order to Show Cause. In the alternative, the filing of a Joint Stipulation will be
deemed compliance. In the absence of a Joint Stipulation, defense counsel’s requested
dates are approved.
MEMORANDUM
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MEMORANDUM
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MEMORANDUM
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?