Ricky Ramos v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Filing 19

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: The case is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs and expenses. Re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 18 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (ib)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Steven G. Rosales Attorney at Law: 222224 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562)868-5886 Fax: (562)868-5491 E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Ricky Ramos 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 8 9 10 11 RICKY RAMOS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 17 ) Case No.: 2:16-cv-06502-CAS-AFM ) ) /PROPOSED/ ORDER OF ) DISMISSAL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 The above captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: 3/13/2017 ___________________________________ ALEXANDER F. MACKINNON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 -1- 1 2 3 4 DATE: March 8, 2017 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING /s/ Steven G. Rosales BY: __________________ Steven G. Rosales Attorney for plaintiff Ricky Ramos 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -2- 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FOR CASE NUMBER 2:16-CV-06502-CAS-AFM I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Court for this court by using the CM/ECF system on March 8, 2017. I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system. /s/ Steven G. Rosales _______________________________ Steven G. Rosales Attorneys for Plaintiff ___________ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?