Felix Federico Nicolas Junior v. M.E. Spearman
Filing
21
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNTIED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John F. Walter. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ("Petition"), all of the records her ein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"). The time for filing Objections to the Report has passed, and no Objections have been filed with the Court. Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is DENIED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. 18 (gr)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
FELIX FEDERICO NICOLAS, JR.,
Petitioner,
v.
)
)
)
)
)
M.E. SPEARMAN,
)
)
Respondent.
_________________________________ )
NO. CV 16-6521-JFW (KS)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas
19
Corpus (“Petition”), all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United
20
States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). The time for filing Objections to the Report has passed,
21
and no Objections have been filed with the Court. Having completed its review, the Court
22
accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report.
23
ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is DENIED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing
24
this action with prejudice.
Accordingly, IT IS
25
26
27
28
DATED:
June 28, 2017
________________________________
JOHN F. WALTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?