Max Chung Lin et al v. Government Employees Insurance Company et al

Filing 40

JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner, 39 . Note: Changes Made by the Court. Refer to the Court's order for details. (pso)

Download PDF
1 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP A Limited Liability Partnership 2 Including Professional Corporations JOHN T. BROOKS, Cal. Bar No. 167793 3 jbrooks@sheppardmullin.com 501 W. Broadway, 19th Floor 4 San Diego, California 92101 NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT Telephone: 619.338.6500 5 Facsimile: 619.234.3815 6 SUZANNE Y. BADAWI, Cal. Bar No. 194692 sbadawi@sheppardmullin.com 333 South Hope Street, 43rd Floor 7 Los Angeles, California 90071-1422 8 Telephone: 213.620.1780 Facsimile: 213.620.1398 9 Attorneys for Defendant 10 Government Employees Insurance Company (“GEICO”), erroneously sued as 11 “GEICO General Insurance Company” 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 14 MAX CHUNG LIN, individually and 15 LILIANA M. LANZA, individually, Plaintiffs, 16 17 Case No. 2:16-cv-06556-RGK-JPR Hon. R. Gary Klausner Courtroom: 850 (Roybal) JUDGMENT v. 18 GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DOES 1 through 100, 19 inclusive, (Complaint Filed: August 2, 2016) Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 2:16-cv-06556-RGK-JPR SMRH:482998378.1 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT RE DEFENDANT GEICO’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR ALT., MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1 It appearing from the files and records of this action that, on June 19, 2017, 2 the Motion For Summary Judgment or, Alternatively, Motion for Partial Summary 3 Judgment by Defendant Government Employees Insurance Company’s (“GEICO”) 4 (erroneously sued as “GEICO General Insurance Company”) regarding the 5 Complaint of Plaintiffs Max Chung Lin and Liliana Lanza (collectively “Plaintiffs”) 6 was granted and good cause having been shown; 7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 8 1. Plaintiffs take nothing by way of their Complaint with respect to 9 Defendant GEICO, and a judgment be entered in favor of Defendant GEICO and 10 against Plaintiffs Max Chung Lin and Liliana Lanza on the Complaint. 11 12 Dated: June 27, 2017 13 By: 14 HON. R. GARY KLAUSNER 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1SMRH:482998378.1 Case No. 2:16-cv-06556-RGK-JPR [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT RE DEFENDANT GEICO’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR ALT., MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?