The Rag Place, Inc. v. Los Angeles Rag House, Inc.

Filing 41

STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 40 ) filed by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (ah)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THE RAG PLACE, INC., a California Corporation Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. LOS ANGELES RAG HOUSE, INC., a California Corporation, a California corporation Defendant, CASE NO. 2:16-cv-06582-RGK-SK STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 40) 1 BASED UPON THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND FOR GOOD CAUSE 2 3 4 SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. This Court has jurisdiction over Defendant Los Angeles Rag House, 5 6 Inc. (“LARH”) and the subject matter of this action under 28 U.S.C §§ 1331 and 7 8 1338(a). Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C §§ 1391(b) and (c). 9 2. For purposes of this case, Plaintiff The Rag Place, Inc. (“TRP”) is the 10 11 owner of all rights, titles, and interests in and to the ULTRABOUNCE® trademark, 12 13 the KNOCKOUT® trademark, and the MAGIC CLOTH™ trademark (collectively 14 15 16 “Trademarks-at-Issue”). 3. LARH agrees not to contest the validity and enforceability of the 17 18 Trademarks-at-Issue. 19 20 21 4. Effective as of the date this Stipulated Permanent Injunction and Dismissal with Prejudice (“Stipulated Consent Judgment”) is entered by the Court, 22 23 LARH and its subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, directors, agents, servants, 24 25 26 employees, successors and assigns, and all other persons and organizations in active concert or participation with any of the foregoing, are hereby permanently enjoined 27 28 and restrained from engaging in any of the following activities: -1- 1 (a) importing, exporting, manufacturing, marketing, advertising, 2 3 4 offering for sale or rent, selling, and renting out any product that infringes the Trademarks-at-Issue; 5 6 (b) otherwise infringing any the Trademarks-at-Issue; and (c) assisting, aiding, or abetting any other person or business entity 7 8 9 in engaging in or performing any of the activities referred to in subparagraphs (a) 10 11 and (b) above. 12 13 5. TRP and LARH shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. 6. This Stipulated Consent Judgment constitutes a final judgment 14 15 16 concerning the subject matter of this action as between TRP and LARH. 17 18 7. TRP and LARH waive any right to appeal from this Stipulated 19 20 21 Consent Judgment. 8. Upon entry of this Stipulated Consent Judgment, Case No. 2:16-cv- 22 23 06582-RGK-SK is dismissed with prejudice, provided, however, that this Court 24 25 26 shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms and provisions of this Stipulated Consent Judgment and the terms of the parties’ Settlement Agreement. 27 28 -2- 1 9. The Court dismisses the matter with prejudice; however, upon 2 3 4 application by either party, the Court may reopen the matter for the limited purpose of enforcing the parties’ Settlement Agreement. 5 6 7 SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 8 9 Dated: August 22, 2017 10 11 ___________________________ Honorable R. Gary Klausner United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?