The Rag Place, Inc. v. Los Angeles Rag House, Inc.
Filing
41
STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 40 ) filed by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (ah)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
THE RAG PLACE, INC., a
California Corporation
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
vs.
LOS ANGELES RAG HOUSE,
INC., a California Corporation, a
California corporation
Defendant,
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-06582-RGK-SK
STIPULATED PERMANENT
INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 40)
1
BASED UPON THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND FOR GOOD CAUSE
2
3
4
SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.
This Court has jurisdiction over Defendant Los Angeles Rag House,
5
6
Inc. (“LARH”) and the subject matter of this action under 28 U.S.C §§ 1331 and
7
8
1338(a). Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C §§ 1391(b) and (c).
9
2.
For purposes of this case, Plaintiff The Rag Place, Inc. (“TRP”) is the
10
11
owner of all rights, titles, and interests in and to the ULTRABOUNCE® trademark,
12
13
the KNOCKOUT® trademark, and the MAGIC CLOTH™ trademark (collectively
14
15
16
“Trademarks-at-Issue”).
3.
LARH agrees not to contest the validity and enforceability of the
17
18
Trademarks-at-Issue.
19
20
21
4.
Effective as of the date this Stipulated Permanent Injunction and
Dismissal with Prejudice (“Stipulated Consent Judgment”) is entered by the Court,
22
23
LARH and its subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, directors, agents, servants,
24
25
26
employees, successors and assigns, and all other persons and organizations in active
concert or participation with any of the foregoing, are hereby permanently enjoined
27
28
and restrained from engaging in any of the following activities:
-1-
1
(a)
importing, exporting, manufacturing, marketing, advertising,
2
3
4
offering for sale or rent, selling, and renting out any product that infringes the
Trademarks-at-Issue;
5
6
(b)
otherwise infringing any the Trademarks-at-Issue; and
(c)
assisting, aiding, or abetting any other person or business entity
7
8
9
in engaging in or performing any of the activities referred to in subparagraphs (a)
10
11
and (b) above.
12
13
5.
TRP and LARH shall bear their own costs and attorney fees.
6.
This Stipulated Consent Judgment constitutes a final judgment
14
15
16
concerning the subject matter of this action as between TRP and LARH.
17
18
7.
TRP and LARH waive any right to appeal from this Stipulated
19
20
21
Consent Judgment.
8.
Upon entry of this Stipulated Consent Judgment, Case No. 2:16-cv-
22
23
06582-RGK-SK is dismissed with prejudice, provided, however, that this Court
24
25
26
shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms and provisions of this Stipulated
Consent Judgment and the terms of the parties’ Settlement Agreement.
27
28
-2-
1
9.
The Court dismisses the matter with prejudice; however, upon
2
3
4
application by either party, the Court may reopen the matter for the limited purpose
of enforcing the parties’ Settlement Agreement.
5
6
7
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
8
9
Dated: August 22, 2017
10
11
___________________________
Honorable R. Gary Klausner
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?