Luke Delgadillo Garcia v. California Expanded Metal Products

Filing 14

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation 12 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Luke Delgadillo Garcia's claims against Defendant California Expanded Metal Products Company, as set forth in the Notice and Complaint filed in the action, are hereby dismissed with prejudice consistent with the terms of the Consent Decree that is attached to the parties' stipulation as Exhibit 2 (Doc. # 12 -2). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the parties through 1/10/2019, for the sole purpose of resolving any disputes between the parties with respect to any provision of the Settlement Agreement, or through the conclusion of any proceeding to enforce the Settlement Agreement initiated prior to 1/10/2019, or until the completion of any payment or affirmative duty required by the Settlement Agreement. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LUKE DELGADILLO GARCIA, ) Case No.: CV 16-6620-DMG (KSx) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION ) WITH PREJUDICE [12] CALIFORNIA EXPANDED METAL ) PRODUCTS COMPANY, a California ) corporation. ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) 1 Good cause appearing, and the parties having stipulated and agreed, 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Luke Delgadillo Garcia’s claims 3 against Defendant California Expanded Metal Products Company, as set forth in the 4 Notice and Complaint filed in the above-captioned action, are hereby dismissed with 5 prejudice consistent with the terms of the Consent Decree that is attached to the 6 parties’ stipulation as Exhibit 2 [Doc. # 12-2]. 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the 8 parties through January 10, 2019, for the sole purpose of resolving any disputes 9 between the parties with respect to any provision of the Settlement Agreement, or 10 through the conclusion of any proceeding to enforce the Settlement Agreement 11 initiated prior to January 10, 2019, or until the completion of any payment or 12 affirmative duty required by the Settlement Agreement. 13 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: January 10, 2017 _______________________________ DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?