Luke Delgadillo Garcia v. California Expanded Metal Products
Filing
14
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation #12 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Luke Delgadillo Garcia's claims against Defendant California Expanded Metal Products Company, as set forth in the Notice and Complaint filed in the action, are hereby dismissed with prejudice consistent with the terms of the Consent Decree that is attached to the parties' stipulation as Exhibit 2 (Doc. #12 -2). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the parties through 1/10/2019, for the sole purpose of resolving any disputes between the parties with respect to any provision of the Settlement Agreement, or through the conclusion of any proceeding to enforce the Settlement Agreement initiated prior to 1/10/2019, or until the completion of any payment or affirmative duty required by the Settlement Agreement. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LUKE DELGADILLO GARCIA,
) Case No.: CV 16-6620-DMG (KSx)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
) WITH PREJUDICE [12]
CALIFORNIA EXPANDED METAL )
PRODUCTS COMPANY, a California )
corporation.
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
1
Good cause appearing, and the parties having stipulated and agreed,
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Luke Delgadillo Garcia’s claims
3 against Defendant California Expanded Metal Products Company, as set forth in the
4 Notice and Complaint filed in the above-captioned action, are hereby dismissed with
5 prejudice consistent with the terms of the Consent Decree that is attached to the
6 parties’ stipulation as Exhibit 2 [Doc. # 12-2].
7
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the
8 parties through January 10, 2019, for the sole purpose of resolving any disputes
9 between the parties with respect to any provision of the Settlement Agreement, or
10 through the conclusion of any proceeding to enforce the Settlement Agreement
11 initiated prior to January 10, 2019, or until the completion of any payment or
12 affirmative duty required by the Settlement Agreement.
13 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATED: January 10, 2017
_______________________________
DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?