Airbnb, Inc. v. City of Santa Monica

Filing 24

ORDER LIFTING STAY AND SETTING NEW BRIEFING SCHEDULE #23 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiffs Amended Complaints and Joint Motion for Preliminary Injunction: February 24, 2017; Amicus Curiae Briefs in Support of Plaintiffs Motion: March 8, 2017; Defendants Opposition:April 7, 2017; Amicus Curiae Briefs in Support of Defendants Opposition: April 19, 201; Plaintiffs Joint Reply: May 3, 2017;Hearing on Motion for Preliminary Injunction:June 5, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. (lc). Modified on 2/8/2017. (lc).

O

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

United States District Court
Central District of California

8
9
10
11

HOMEAWAY.COM, INC.

Case Nos. 2:16-cv-06641-ODW (AFM)

12

Plaintiff,

2:16-cv-06645-ODW (AFM)

v.

13
14

CITY OF SANTA MONICA,

15

Defendant.

ORDER LIFTING STAY AND

16

SETTING NEW BRIEFING

17

SCHEDULE

18
19

AIRBNB, INC.,
Plaintiff,

20
21

v.

22

CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Defendant.

23
24
25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

1

On September 22, 2016, the Court granted a stay of proceedings until January

2

12, 2017, in each of these cases to allow for additional discussions between the parties

3

about the ordinance. (See ECF No. 20.) On February 7, 2017, the parties filed a

4

stipulation with the Court to lift the stay and set a new briefing schedule as they have

5

been unable to resolve their differences related to the ordinance. (ECF No. 23.)

6

Accordingly, the Court lifts the stay and sets the following briefing schedule.

7
8

Submission

Due Date

9

Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaints and Joint February 24, 2017

10

Motion for Preliminary Injunction

11

Amicus Curiae Briefs in Support of March 8, 2017

12

Plaintiffs’ Motion

13

Defendant’s Opposition

14

Amicus Curiae Briefs in Support of April 19, 2017

15

Defendant’s Opposition

16

Plaintiffs’ Joint Reply

17

Hearing on Motion for Preliminary June 5, 2017 at 1:30 p.m.

18

Injunction

April 7, 2017

May 3, 2017

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

1

Per the parties stipulation, Defendant City of Santa Monica shall not enforce or

2

seek enforcement of the ordinance and its amendments against Plaintiffs, including

3

retroactively, for the period necessary for the parties to brief and for the Court to

4

resolve Plaintiffs’ Joint Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, and until fourteen days

5

after any order denying Plaintiffs’ Joint Motion for a Preliminary Injunction.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8

February 8, 2017

9
10
11

____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3