Lois A. Manigo et al v. Time Warner Cable Inc. et al

Filing 124

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS TIME WARNER CABLE INC. AND TWC ADMINISTRATION LLC by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT Judgment in the above-captioned matter is hereby entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs shall take nothing by way of their Complaint, and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)

1

JS-6

2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11
12
13
14
15

LOIS A. MANIGO, ORLANDO
GUTIERREZ, PHILIP MARTINEZ,
PATRICIA VALLADARESGALLEGOS, SHANA GILMORE, and
WARREN V. NICHOLS, Individually
and on Behalf of all Others Similarly
Situated,
Plaintiffs,

16
17

vs.

18

CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-06722-JFW-PLA
Judge John F. Walter (Courtroom 7A)

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF
DEFENDANTS TIME WARNER
CABLE INC. AND TWC
ADMINISTRATION LLC

TIME WARNER CABLE INC. and
TWC ADMINISTRATION LLC,

19
20
21

Defendants.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PROPOSED JUDGMENT

1

By Order dated October 18, 2017 [D.E. 122], this Court granted Defendants

2

Time Warner Cable Inc.’s and TWC Administration LLC’s (collectively

3

“Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment in its entirety. Specifically, the Court

4

granted summary judgment in Defendants’ favor, and against Plaintiffs Lois Manigo,

5

Shana Gilmore, Warren Nichols, Orlando Gutierrez, Philip Martinez and Patricia

6

Valladares-Gallegos (collectively “Plaintiffs”), as to all claims at issue in this case.

7
8
9

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT Judgment in the
above-captioned matter is hereby entered in favor of Defendants and against

10

Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs shall take nothing by way of their Complaint, and this action is

11

dismissed with prejudice.

12
13
14
15

Dated: October 24, 2017

_______________________________
HON. JOHN F. WALTER
United States District Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JUDGMENT