Darryl M. Jones v. Christian Trust et al

Filing 57

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 54 by Judge Dolly M. Gee. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that a Judgment of Dismissal with Prejudice is entered in favor of Defendant CHRISTIANA TRUST, A DIVISION OF WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT AS TRUSTEE OF ARLP TRUST 2 and against Plaintiff DARRYL M. JONES. (lom)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARRYL M. JONES 12 13 Plaintiff, vs. Case No.: CV 16-6919-DMG (AGRx) JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [54] 14 15 16 17 Christiana Trust, a Division of Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB; and DOES 1-50 and DOES 1-10 inclusive, 18 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 On June 5, 2017, this Court entered an Order granting Defendant CHRISTIANA 2 TRUST, A DIVISION OF WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, NOT IN 3 ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT AS TRUSTEE OF ARLP TRUST 2’s (erroneously 4 sued as “CHRISTIAN TRUST, A DIVISION OF WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND 5 SOCIETY, FSB”) (“Christiana”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff DARRYL M. JONES’ 6 Third Amended Complaint With Prejudice. [Doc. # 52.] 7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that 8 a Judgment of Dismissal with Prejudice is entered in favor of Defendant CHRISTIANA 9 TRUST, A DIVISION OF WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, NOT IN 10 ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT AS TRUSTEE OF ARLP TRUST 2 and against 11 Plaintiff DARRYL M. JONES. 12 13 14 15 DATED: June 15, 2017 DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?