Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Target Corporation et al

Filing 42

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT TARGET CORPORATION WITH PREJUDICE 40 by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell that this entire action, and all of the claims asserted therein, be dismissed with prejudice against Defendant Target Corporation pursuant to FRCP 41(a). Each party shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs associated with this action. Dismissal with prejudice of Deckers' claims against Defendant Target Corporation shall not have preclusive effect on those who are not specificall y released herein, all claims against whom Plaintiff expressly reserves. For the avoidance of doubt, dismissal of Defendant Target Corporation shall have no affect on Plaintiff's remaining claims against Defendant Nina Footwear Corp. dba Nina Shoes. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Brent H. Blakely (SBN 157292) bblakely@blakelylawgroup.com Cindy Chan (SBN 247495) cchan@blakelylawgroup.com BLAKELY LAW GROUP 1334 Parkview Avenue, Suite 280 Manhattan Beach, California 90266 Telephone: (310) 546-7400 Facsimile: (310) 546-7401 Attorneys for Plaintiff Deckers Outdoor Corporation 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ) CASE NO. 2:16-cv-06925-BRO (ASx) ) ) ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT ) TARGET CORPORATION WITH ) PREJUDICE Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) TARGET CORPORATION, a Minnesota ) Hon. Beverly Reid O’Connell Corporation; NINA FOOTWEAR CORP. ) ) dba NINA SHOES, a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, ) ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this entire action, and all of the claims asserted 2 therein, be dismissed with prejudice against Defendant Target Corporation pursuant to 3 Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a). Each party shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs 4 associated with this action. 5 Dismissal with prejudice of Deckers’ claims against Defendant Target 6 Corporation shall not have preclusive effect on those who are not specifically released 7 herein, all claims against whom Plaintiff expressly reserves. For the avoidance of 8 doubt, dismissal of Defendant Target Corporation shall have no affect on Plaintiff’s 9 remaining claims against Defendant Nina Footwear Corp. dba Nina Shoes. 10 11 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 29, 2017 By: Honorable Beverly R. O’Connell United States District Court Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?