United States of America v. Nana M. Gyamfi
Filing
15
DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu, in favor of United States of America against Nana M. Gyamfi in the principal amount of $45,633.91, interest in the amount of $73,316.34, attorneys fees of $3,332.04, costs of $495.50 for a total judgment of $122,777.79 Related to: REQUEST for Default Judgment against DEFENDANT NANA M. GYAMFI 14 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo)
1 GOLDSMITH & HULL/File #CDCS417
A Professional Corporation
2 William I. Goldsmith (SBN 82183)
Michael L. Goldsmith (SBN 291700)
3 16933 Parthenia Street, Suite 110
Northridge, CA 91343
4 Tel.: (818) 990-6600
Fax: (818) 990-6140
5 govdept1@goldsmithcalaw.com
6 Attorneys for Plaintiff
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
12
Plaintiff,
13 v.
14 NANA M. GYAMFI,
15
Defendant.
16
17
) CASE NO. 2:16-cv-07134-GW-JPR
)
)
) DEFAULT JUDGMENT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
In the above-entitled action the Clerk of this Court having entered a default
18 against Defendant(s) NANA M. GYAMFI, on FEBRUARY 1,2017
for failure to
19 respond or appear; and a declaration on behalf of Plaintiff having been filed which
20 satisfies the requirements of F.R.Civ. P. 55(b),
21
IT IS ADJUDGED that Plaintiff, United States of America, shall have and
22 recover from Defendant(s) NANA M. GYAMFI, the sum of $45,633.91 principal,
23 $73,316.34 accrued pre-judgment interest, $0.00 penalties/administrative charges,
24 $495.50 court cost, plus $3,332.04 attorneys fees, less credits of $0.00, for a
25 //
26 //
27 //
28 //
1
total of $122,777.79 plus interest from February 2, 2017, at the rate of $0.51, $0.73,
2 $1.73, $3.38, $0.49, and $0.79 per day to date of entry of judgment. Judgment to
3 accrue interest at the legal rate until paid.
4
5 DATE:
2/6/2017
KIRY K. GRAY, CLERK OF THE COURT
U.S. District Court Central District of California
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 :P549F
28
BY:
DEPUTY CLERK
Y
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?