IV Solutions, Inc. v. Pacificare Life and Health Insurance Company et al

Filing 72

JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: 1. Judgment shall be entered in favor of PacifiCare and against Plaintiff IV Solutions, Inc. (IVS); 2. IVS shall take nothing by this action; 3. The Court dismisses the above-captioned action with prejudice; and 4. PacifiCare shall recover its costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)

Download PDF
1 2 3 October 16, 2017 4 VC P 5 JS-6 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 IV SOLUTIONS, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, [State Complaint No. BC 630193 Filed: August 11, 2016] Hon. James Otero v. PACIFICARE LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, an Indiana corporation; and DOES 1 through 30, inclusive, 18 Case No. 2:16-cv-07153-SJO-MRW Defendant. JUDGMENT Hearing Date: Vacated per FRCP 78(b) Hearing Time: Vacated per FRCP 78(b) Courtroom: 10C 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT; CASE NO. 2:16-CV-07153-SJO-MRW ATTORNEYS AT LAW LAACTIVE-602860880-2 1 2 The Court, having granted Defendant PacifiCare Life and Health Insurance Company’s (“PacifiCare”) Motion for Summary Judgment, orders as follows: 3 IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: 4 1. 5 Judgment shall be entered in favor of PacifiCare and against Plaintiff IV Solutions, Inc. (“IVS”); 6 2. IVS shall take nothing by this action; 7 3. The Court dismisses the above-captioned action with prejudice; and 8 4. PacifiCare shall recover its costs. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: October 16, 2017 __________________________ Hon. James Otero United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP -1- ATTORNEYS AT LAW LAACTIVE-602860880-2 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT; CASE NO. 2:16-CV-07153-SJO-MRW 1 2 3 4 5 PROOF OF SERVICE I, Debra A. Jackson, state: My business address is 3 Park Plaza, 20th Floor, Irvine, CA 92614-8505. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to this action. On the date set forth below, I served the foregoing document(s) described as: 6 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 7 on the following person(s) in this action: 8 Counsel for Plaintiff IV Solutions: 9 Marc E. Rohatiner (SBN. 82709) mrohatiner@wrslawyers.com Eric Levinrad (SBN 169025) elevinrad@wrslawyers.com WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO, SCHULMAN & RABKIN, LLP 11400 W. Olympic Blvd., 9th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90064-1582 310-478-4100 Fax: 310-479-1422 10 11 12 13 14  BY FIRST CLASS MAIL: I am employed in the County of Orange County where the mailing occurred. I enclosed the document(s) identified above in a sealed envelope or package addressed to the person(s) listed above, with postage fully paid. I placed the envelope or package for collection and mailing, following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this firm’s practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service.  BY ELECTRONIC MAIL: Based on a court order or an agreement of the parties to accept service by electronic mail, I caused the document(s) identified above to be transmitted electronically to the person(s) at the e-mail address(es) listed above. I did not receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States and the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on October 13, 2017, at Irvine, California. 25 26 Debra A. Jackson 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP -2- ATTORNEYS AT LAW LAACTIVE-602860880-2 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES ISO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; CASE NO. 2:16-CV-07153-SJO-MRW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?