Rachel Velasquez v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
27
JUDGMENT OF REMAND by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: The Court, having approved the parties Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (Stipulation to Remand) 26 lodged concurre nt with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ad)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
SANDRA R. BROWN
Acting United States Attorney
DOROTHY A. SCHOUTEN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Civil Division
ROBYN-MARIE LYON MONTELEONE
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, General Civil Section
LYNN HARADA [C.S.B.N. 267616]
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration, Region IX
160 Spear St., Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: 415-977-8977
Facsimile: 415-744-0134
e-mail: Lynn.Harada@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
14
15
16
17
18
JS-6
RACHEL VELASQUEZ,
Plaintiff,
vs.
) No. 2:16-cv-07227-KK
) [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF
) REMAND
)
)
)
)
)
)
22
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant.
_______________________________
The Court, having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand
23
Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment
24
(“Stipulation to Remand”) lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within Judgment
25
of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the
26
above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further
27
proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand.
28
DATED: June 30, 2017
19
20
21
HON. KENLY KIYA KATO
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?