Parham Javaheripur v. Fifth Third Bank et al

Filing 28

ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon the parties' Stipulated Motion to Dismiss #27 , the action between Plaintiff Parham Javaheripur and Defendant Fifth Third Bank is dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and expense. (gk)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

PARHAM JAVAHERIPUR,

Case No.: CV 16-7279-DMG (JCx)

11

Plaintiff,
12

vs.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL [27]

13

FIFTH THIRD BANK; and DOE 1-5,
14

Defendants.
15
16
17

Having considered the parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 27], the

18

action between Plaintiff Parham Javaheripur and Defendant Fifth Third Bank is

19

dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and expense.

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22
23

DATED: July 18, 2017
DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28

–1–