Stephen P. Wilson v. Shawn Hatton

Filing 25

JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter, in favor of Shawn Hatton against Stephen P. Wilson Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 24 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition is denied, this action is dismissed with prejudice and Judgment be entered accordingly. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbou)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

STEPHEN P. WILSON,

)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
SHAWN HATTON, Acting Warden, )
)
)
Respondent.
)
)
________________________________

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. CV 16-7599 DOC(JC)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of
Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (“Petition”) and all of the records
herein, including the April 4, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation”). The Court approves and
accepts the Report and Recommendation.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition is denied, this action is
dismissed with prejudice and Judgment be entered accordingly.
///
///
///

1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and

2 the Judgment herein on counsel for petitioner and respondent.
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
April 30, 2019
5 DATED: ________________
6
7

________________________________________

8

HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

STEPHEN P. WILSON,

)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
SHAWN HATTON, Acting Warden, )
)
)
Respondent.
)
______________________________

Case No. CV 16-7599 DOC(JC)
JUDGMENT

Pursuant to this Court’s Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and
Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge,
IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person
in State Custody is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ADJUDGED.
April 30, 2019
DATED: ________________

25
26
27
28

_______________________________________
HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE