Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. M.L. Alexander Electric Co., Inc.

Filing 23

JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real: Upon Stipulation 21 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Defined Contribution Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Trust Fund, Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund, Tru stees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund, Trustees of Southern California IBEW-NECA Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the National NECA-IBEW Labor-Management Cooperation Committee Trust Fund, National Electrical Industry Fund, and Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, shall recover from Defendant M.L. Alexander Electric Co., Inc., a California corporation doing business as "Alexander Electric Company," the principal amount of $85,958.79, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest at the rate of 8% per annum accruing from 2/10/2017, until the judgment is paid in full. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-07704 R (Ex) TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IBEW-NECA PENSION PLAN, TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IBEWNECA DEFINED CONTRIBUTION TRUST FUND; TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IBEWNECA HEALTH TRUST FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IBEW-NECA SUPPLEMENTAL UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT TRUST FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY ELECTRICAL EDUCATIONAL AND TRAINING TRUST FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND, TRUSTEES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IBEWNECA LABOR-MANAGEMENT COOPERATION COMMITTEE, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL NECA-IBEW LABOR-MANAGEMENT COOPERATION COMMITTEE TRUST FUND, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY FUND, and LOS ANGELES ELECTRICAL WORKERS CREDIT UNION, Plaintiffs, Assigned to the Honorable Manuel L. Real JUDGMENT vs. M.L. ALEXANDER ELECTRIC CO., INC., a California corporation doing business as “ALEXANDER ELECTRIC COMPANY,” 28 Defendant. 1 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT.DOC 1 This action having been commenced on October 7, 2016, and the Court having 2 approved the stipulation for entry of judgment in favor of plaintiffs, Trustees of the 3 Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, et al., and against defendants, M.L. 4 Alexander Electric Co., Inc., a California corporation doing business as “Alexander 5 Electric Company,” and for good cause shown, 6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs, 7 Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the 8 Southern California IBEW-NECA Defined Contribution Trust Fund, Trustees of the 9 Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern 10 California IBEW-NECA Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Trust Fund, Trustees 11 of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund, Trustees 12 of the National Electrical Benefit Fund, Trustees of Southern California IBEW-NECA 13 Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the National NECA-IBEW 14 Labor-Management Cooperation Committee Trust Fund, National Electrical Industry 15 Fund, and Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, shall recover from Defendant 16 M.L. Alexander Electric Co., Inc., a California corporation doing business as 17 “Alexander Electric Company,” the principal amount of $85,958.79, together with pre- 18 judgment and post-judgment interest at the rate of 8% per annum accruing from 19 February 10, 2017, until the judgment is paid in full. 20 21 22 DATED: February 14, 2017 _______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT.DOC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?